278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26474933)
1. Stability of bicortical screw versus plate fixation after mandibular setback with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26474933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are bicortical screw and plate osteosynthesis techniques equal in providing skeletal stability with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy when used for mandibular advancement surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Moraissi EA; Al-Hendi EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1195-200. PubMed ID: 27185389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?
Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1360-71. PubMed ID: 25871900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review.
Joss CU; Vassalli IM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 19138603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Fixation Method Affect Stability of Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Condylar Position?
Tabrizi R; Pourdanesh F; Sadeghi HM; Shahidi S; Poorian B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2668.e1-2668.e6. PubMed ID: 28939191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Intraoral Miniplate Fixation Have Good Postoperative Stability After Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy? Comparison With Intraoral Bicortical Screw Fixation.
Matsushita Y; Nakakuki K; Kosugi M; Kurohara K; Harada K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 74(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 26117377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
Demircan S; Uretürk EU; Apaydın A; Şen S
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2810763. PubMed ID: 32185199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
Oh JS; Kim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of fixation method on intergonial width stability after mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Jafarian M; Alam M; Shafiei S; Moslemi H; Tabrizi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 49(11):1430-1434. PubMed ID: 32423690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D vector analysis of mandibular condyle stability in mandibular setback surgery with bicortical bioabsorbable screw fixation.
Lee JH; Kim SM; Lee BK; Jeon JH; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e105-10. PubMed ID: 24172189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Versus Distraction Osteogenesis for Advancement of the Retrognathic Mandible.
Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 73(8):1564-74. PubMed ID: 25857283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between the rigidity of bicortical screws and a miniplate for fixation of a mandibular setback after a simulated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Tharanon W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Sep; 56(9):1055-8. PubMed ID: 9734767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified hybrid fixation using absorbable plate and screw for mandibular advancement surgery.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Baba N; Sato M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1788-1793. PubMed ID: 28927955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandibular stability using sliding or conventional four-hole plates for fixation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback.
Lee HG; Agpoon KJ; Besana AN; Lim HK; Jang HS; Lee ES
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 55(4):378-382. PubMed ID: 27931722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does adjunctive fixation in conjunction with miniplate affect condylar position and morphology after mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy? A retrospective 3-dimensional CT comparative study.
Al-Watary MQ; Telha WA; Ge H; Wu Y; Sun X; Qing Z; Li J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 38627189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
