These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26474933)

  • 21. The effect of different hybrid rigid internal fixation techniques on the postoperative stability following a mandibular advancement using a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A retrospective three-dimensional comparative study.
    Telha W; Al-Watary MQ; Sakran K; Chen H; Bi R; Zhu S; Jiang N
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; 125(2):101667. PubMed ID: 38738550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the stability of miniplate with bicortical screw fixation after sagittal split setback.
    Choi BH; Min YS; Yi CK; Lee WY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):416-9. PubMed ID: 11027376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The need for intermaxillary fixation in sagittal split osteotomy setbacks with bicortical screw fixation.
    Choi BH; Zhu SJ; Han SG; Huh JY; Kim BY; Jung JH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Sep; 100(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 16122655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A novel instrument for the prevention of condylar torque in bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy when using bicortical screw fixation.
    Van den Borre C; Van de Casteele E; Boeckx P; Nadjmi N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Mar; 51(3):376-379. PubMed ID: 34325976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
    Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between fixation method and early central condylar sagging after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in orthognathic surgery.
    Berköz Ö; Karaali S; Kozanoğlu E; Akalın BE; Çeri A; Barış Ş; Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 48(10):928-932. PubMed ID: 32873467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of stabilization of a bilateral sagittal split on orthodontic finishing after mandibular setback: a case for bicortical fixation.
    McHugh M; Van Sickels JE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e301-9. PubMed ID: 22177807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Post-BSSO condylar position stability: a comparison of miniplate and lag screw fixation.
    Aliabadi E; Eskandari F; Zanjani M; Babouei M
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):728. PubMed ID: 38918762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis and comparison of clinical results of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy performed with the use of monocortical locking plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
    Kabasawa Y; Sato M; Kikuchi T; Sato Y; Takahashi Y; Higuchi Y; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):e333-41. PubMed ID: 22831752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
    Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
    Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Intersegmental Displacement After Mandibular Setback Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Modified L-Shaped Monocortical Plate: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition.
    Hwang DS; Lee HG; Shin SH; Kim UK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 May; 29(3):655-660. PubMed ID: 29283940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk factors for breakage of biodegradable plate systems after bilateral sagittal split mandibular setback surgery.
    Yoshioka I; Igawa K; Nagata J; Yoshida M; Baba T; Ichiki T; Kondoh Y; Takamori K; Kashima K; Sakoda S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 51(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 22784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial frontal morphological changes related to mandibular setback osteotomy using cephalograms.
    Amano K; Yagi T; Iida S; Aikawa T; Yamashiro T; Takada K; Kogo M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):412-6. PubMed ID: 19482484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of intersegmental displacement according to osteosynthesis method for mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition.
    Kim YI; Park SB; Jung YH; Hwang DS; Lee JY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2893-8. PubMed ID: 22726704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in condylar long axis and skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with poly-L-lactic acid or titanium plate fixation.
    Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Takazakura D; Shimada M; Takatsuka S; Yamamoto E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):627-34. PubMed ID: 15878821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Sato FR; Asprino L; Fernandes Moreira RW; de Moraes M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e224-9. PubMed ID: 24103461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three Different Fixation Modalities following Mandibular Setback Surgery with Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Comparative Study using Three-dimensional Finite Elements Analysis.
    Eshghpour M; Samieirad S; Shooshtari Z; Shams A; Ghadirimoghaddam N
    World J Plast Surg; 2023; 12(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 37220573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.