These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26475170)

  • 1. In Genes We Trust: Germline Engineering, Eugenics, and the Future of the Human Genome.
    Powell R
    J Med Philos; 2015 Dec; 40(6):669-95. PubMed ID: 26475170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genes, justice, and obligations to future people.
    Kamm FM
    Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):360-88. PubMed ID: 12678094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Germ-line engineering, freedom, and future generations.
    Cooke EF
    Bioethics; 2003 Feb; 17(1):32-58. PubMed ID: 12718332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ambiguity in Habermas's argument against liberal eugenics.
    Schäfer LP
    Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 31463995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imagining human enhancement: whose future, which rationality?
    Tomasini F
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(6):497-507. PubMed ID: 18322820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative eugenics and ethical decisions.
    Fenner DE
    J Med Humanit; 1996; 17(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11660063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships.
    Rehmann-Sutter C
    New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 29529985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designing babies: morally permissible ways to modify the human genome.
    Agar N
    Bioethics; 1995 Jan; 9(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11653029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetics and the common good.
    Tauer CA
    Second Opin (Chic); 2001 Oct; (8):14-35. PubMed ID: 16025643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Triumph or tragedy? The moral meaning of genetic technology.
    Kass LR
    Am J Jurisprud; 2000; 45():1-16. PubMed ID: 16437775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A not-so-new eugenics. Harris and Savulescu on human enhancement.
    Sparrow R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2011; 41(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 21329104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Germ-line enhancement of humans and non-humans.
    Loftis JR
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2005 Mar; 15(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15881796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic enhancement technologies and the new society.
    Smith GP
    Med Law Int; 2000; 4(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14983869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The moral significance of the therapy-enhancement distinction in human genetics.
    Resnik DB
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2000; 9(3):365-77. PubMed ID: 10858885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Playing God" and germline intervention.
    Peters T
    J Med Philos; 1995 Aug; 20(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 8568437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Liberal eugenics and human nature. Against Habermas.
    Fenton E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 17278871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liberal eugenics.
    Agar N
    Public Aff Q; 1998 Apr; 12(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 11657329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The history of eugenics and the future of gene therapy.
    Howell JD
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 11642965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics.
    Harding JR
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991; 18(1):471-512. PubMed ID: 11659992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro eugenics.
    Sparrow R
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 40(11):725-31. PubMed ID: 23557913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.