BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26475221)

  • 1. Lower-limb amputee ankle and hip kinetic response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement.
    Segal AD; Shofer JB; Klute GK
    J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(15):3982-3988. PubMed ID: 26475221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower-limb amputee recovery response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement.
    Segal AD; Klute GK
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):2911-8. PubMed ID: 25145315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of prosthetic foot stiffness on transtibial amputee walking mechanics and balance control during turning.
    Shell CE; Segal AD; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Nov; 49():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hip recovery strategy used by below-knee amputees following mediolateral foot perturbations.
    Miller SE; Segal AD; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    J Biomech; 2018 Jul; 76():61-67. PubMed ID: 29887363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the contralateral limb: a case series.
    Hill D; Herr H
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650375. PubMed ID: 24187194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot.
    Schneider K; Hart T; Zernicke RF; Setoguchi Y; Oppenheim W
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1191-204. PubMed ID: 8253824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait.
    van der Linden ML; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Li N; Paul JP
    J Biomech; 1999 Sep; 32(9):877-89. PubMed ID: 10460124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
    Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
    Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
    Struchkov V; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
    Zmitrewicz RJ; Neptune RR; Walden JG; Rogers WE; Bosker GW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking.
    Grabowski AM; D'Andrea S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 10():49. PubMed ID: 23758860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
    Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility study of transtibial amputee walking using a powered prosthetic foot.
    Grimmer M; Holgate M; Ward J; Boehler A; Seyfarth A
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1118-1123. PubMed ID: 28813971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relative contributions of the prosthetic and sound limb to balance control in unilateral transtibial amputees.
    Curtze C; Hof AL; Postema K; Otten B
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jun; 36(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 22525420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gait patterns of transtibial amputee patients walking indoors barefoot.
    Han TR; Chung SG; Shin HI
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 82(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 12544754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle' damping.
    De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 10():107. PubMed ID: 24134803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetic gait of unilateral lower-limb amputees with current and novel prostheses: A pilot study.
    De Pauw K; Serrien B; Baeyens JP; Cherelle P; De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Bailey SP; Lefeber D; Roelands B; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():59-67. PubMed ID: 31704536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of transtibial amputee and non-amputee biomechanics during a common turning task.
    Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Schoen J; Klute GK
    Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20974535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
    Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.