364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26475221)
41. Energy flow analysis of amputee walking shows a proximally-directed transfer of energy in intact limbs, compared to a distally-directed transfer in prosthetic limbs at push-off.
Weinert-Aplin RA; Howard D; Twiste M; Jarvis HL; Bennett AN; Baker RJ
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Jan; 39():73-82. PubMed ID: 27836575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Experimental characterization of the moment-angle curve during level and slope locomotion of transtibial amputee: Which parameters can be extracted to quantify the adaptations of microprocessor prosthetic ankle?
Davot J; Thomas-Pohl M; Villa C; Bonnet X; Lapeyre E; Bascou J; Pillet H
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jul; 235(7):762-769. PubMed ID: 33784889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of prosthetic ankle energy storage and return properties on muscle activity in below-knee amputee walking.
Ventura JD; Klute GK; Neptune RR
Gait Posture; 2011 Feb; 33(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 21145747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Perceptions and biomechanical effects of varying prosthetic ankle stiffness during uphill walking: A case series.
Ármannsdóttir AL; Lecomte C; Lemaire E; Brynjólfsson S; Briem K
Gait Posture; 2024 Feb; 108():354-360. PubMed ID: 38227995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot.
Perry J; Boyd LA; Rao SS; Mulroy SJ
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1997 Dec; 5(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 9422453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Transtibial amputee joint motion has increased attractor divergence during walking compared to non-amputee gait.
Wurdeman SR; Myers SA; Stergiou N
Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 41(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 23180032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Sprint kinematics of athletes with lower-limb amputations.
Buckley JG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 May; 80(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 10326911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.
De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Roelands B; Lefeber D; Meeusen R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effects of diabetic peripheral neuropathy on gait in vascular trans-tibial amputees.
Nakajima H; Yamamoto S; Katsuhira J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jul; 56():84-89. PubMed ID: 29864596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees.
Morgenroth DC; Segal AD; Zelik KE; Czerniecki JM; Klute GK; Adamczyk PG; Orendurff MS; Hahn ME; Collins SH; Kuo AD
Gait Posture; 2011 Oct; 34(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 21803584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Dynamic input to determine hip joint moments, power and work on the prosthetic limb of transfemoral amputees: ground reaction vs knee reaction.
Frossard L; Cheze L; Dumas R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 21697197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessing the Relative Contributions of Active Ankle and Knee Assistance to the Walking Mechanics of Transfemoral Amputees Using a Powered Prosthesis.
Ingraham KA; Fey NP; Simon AM; Hargrove LJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147661. PubMed ID: 26807889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Biomechanical responses of individuals with transtibial amputation stepping on a coronally uneven and unpredictable surface.
Cyr KM; Segal AD; Neptune RR; Klute GK
J Biomech; 2023 Jun; 155():111622. PubMed ID: 37247517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Energetic consequences of using a prosthesis with adaptive ankle motion during slope walking in persons with a transtibial amputation.
Darter BJ; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Feb; 38(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23525888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees. A comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet.
Colborne GR; Naumann S; Longmuir PE; Berbrayer D
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Oct; 71(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 1388973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.
Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Calculated functional joint center positions are highly variable in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation walking with identical prosthetic ankle-foot devices.
De Asha AR; Barnett CT
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Feb; 46(1):91-94. PubMed ID: 34840279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Local dynamic stability of amputees wearing a torsion adapter compared to a rigid adapter during straight-line and turning gait.
Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Shofer JB; Klute GK
J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2798-803. PubMed ID: 20719315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Compensatory mechanisms of transtibial amputees during circular turning.
Ventura JD; Segal AD; Klute GK; Neptune RR
Gait Posture; 2011 Jul; 34(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 21696958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
