BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26475305)

  • 1. Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe).
    Nanni C; Zamagni E; Versari A; Chauvie S; Bianchi A; Rensi M; Bellò M; Rambaldi I; Gallamini A; Patriarca F; Gay F; Gamberi B; Cavo M; Fanti S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 26475305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe).
    Nanni C; Versari A; Chauvie S; Bertone E; Bianchi A; Rensi M; Bellò M; Gallamini A; Patriarca F; Gay F; Gamberi B; Ghedini P; Cavo M; Fanti S; Zamagni E
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):712-719. PubMed ID: 29270787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. (18)F-FDG dynamic PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: patterns of tracer uptake and correlation with bone marrow plasma cell infiltration rate.
    Sachpekidis C; Mai EK; Goldschmidt H; Hillengass J; Hose D; Pan L; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
    Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):e300-7. PubMed ID: 25783508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 11C-Methionine-PET in Multiple Myeloma: Correlation with Clinical Parameters and Bone Marrow Involvement.
    Lapa C; Knop S; Schreder M; Rudelius M; Knott M; Jörg G; Samnick S; Herrmann K; Buck AK; Einsele H; Lückerath K
    Theranostics; 2016; 6(2):254-61. PubMed ID: 26877783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The prognostic significance of [
    Sachpekidis C; Merz M; Raab MS; Bertsch U; Weru V; Kopp-Schneider A; Jauch A; Goldschmidt H; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
    EJNMMI Res; 2021 Oct; 11(1):100. PubMed ID: 34628525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is there any complimentary role of F-18 NaF PET/CT in detecting of osseous involvement of multiple myeloma? A comparative study for F-18 FDG PET/CT and F-18 FDG NaF PET/CT.
    Ak İ; Onner H; Akay OM
    Ann Hematol; 2015 Sep; 94(9):1567-75. PubMed ID: 26068066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of spinal bone marrow infiltration in untreated patients with multiple myeloma.
    Hur J; Yoon CS; Ryu YH; Yun MJ; Suh JS
    Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 18415787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of an artificial intelligence-based tool in [
    Sachpekidis C; Enqvist O; Ulén J; Kopp-Schneider A; Pan L; Jauch A; Hajiyianni M; John L; Weinhold N; Sauer S; Goldschmidt H; Edenbrandt L; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3697-3708. PubMed ID: 37493665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardization of
    Zamagni E; Nanni C; Dozza L; Carlier T; Bailly C; Tacchetti P; Versari A; Chauvie S; Gallamini A; Gamberi B; Caillot D; Patriarca F; Macro M; Boccadoro M; Garderet L; Barbato S; Fanti S; Perrot A; Gay F; Sonneveld P; Karlin L; Cavo M; Bodet-Milin C; Moreau P; Kraeber-Bodéré F
    J Clin Oncol; 2021 Jan; 39(2):116-125. PubMed ID: 33151787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of (11)C-4'-thiothymidine, (11)C-methionine, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of active lesions of multiple myeloma.
    Okasaki M; Kubota K; Minamimoto R; Miyata Y; Morooka M; Ito K; Ishiwata K; Toyohara J; Inoue T; Hirai R; Hagiwara S; Miwa A
    Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 29(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 25421383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early bone marrow metastasis detection: the additional value of FDG-PET/CT vs. CT imaging.
    Evangelista L; Panunzio A; Polverosi R; Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Pomerri F; Rubello D; Muzzio PC
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2012 Sep; 66(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 22902054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposal for a Quantitative
    Takahashi MES; Mosci C; Souza EM; Brunetto SQ; Etchebehere E; Santos AO; Camacho MR; Miranda E; Lima MCL; Amorim BJ; de Souza C; Pericole FV; Lorand-Metze I; Ramos CD
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16429. PubMed ID: 31712729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma.
    Bredella MA; Steinbach L; Caputo G; Segall G; Hawkins R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1199-204. PubMed ID: 15788594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma.
    Fonti R; Salvatore B; Quarantelli M; Sirignano C; Segreto S; Petruzziello F; Catalano L; Liuzzi R; Rotoli B; Del Vecchio S; Pace L; Salvatore M
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Feb; 49(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18199607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PET/CT studies of multiple myeloma using (18) F-FDG and (18) F-NaF: comparison of distribution patterns and tracers' pharmacokinetics.
    Sachpekidis C; Goldschmidt H; Hose D; Pan L; Cheng C; Kopka K; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Jul; 41(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24562650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma.
    Breyer RJ; Mulligan ME; Smith SE; Line BR; Badros AZ
    Skeletal Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(9):632-40. PubMed ID: 16758246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of FDG-PET/CT in Extramedullary Multiple Myeloma: Correlation of FDG-PET/CT Findings With Clinical Outcome.
    Tirumani SH; Sakellis C; Jacene H; Shinagare AB; Munshi NC; Ramaiya NH; Van den Abbeele AD
    Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 41(1):e7-13. PubMed ID: 26252323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: a review of diagnostic and prognostic features in multiple myeloma and related disorders.
    Dammacco F; Rubini G; Ferrari C; Vacca A; Racanelli V
    Clin Exp Med; 2015 Feb; 15(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 25218739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 11C-choline vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing bone involvement in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Nanni C; Zamagni E; Cavo M; Rubello D; Tacchetti P; Pettinato C; Farsad M; Castellucci P; Ambrosini V; Montini GC; Al-Nahhas A; Franchi R; Fanti S
    World J Surg Oncol; 2007 Jun; 5():68. PubMed ID: 17584499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT have similar performance but different imaging patterns in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    Mosci C; Pericole FV; Oliveira GB; Delamain MT; Takahashi MES; Carvalheira JBC; Etchebehere ECSC; Santos AO; Miranda ECM; Lima MCL; Amorim BJ; de Souza CA; Lorand-Metze I; Ramos CD
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Oct; 41(10):1081-1088. PubMed ID: 32732603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.