These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 264777)

  • 1. The saddle angle: constancy or change?
    Lewis AB; Roche AF
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Jan; 47(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 264777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion.
    Anderson DL; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 6579875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects.
    Alkofide EA
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 17693429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible. Comparisons within individuals.
    Lewis AB; Roche AF; Wagner B
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Jan; 55(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 3856404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusions in transitional dentition.
    Kapoor S; Kapoor DN; Jaiswal JN
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 12396087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study.
    Siriwat PP; Jarabak JR
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 3874569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of cranial base growth in Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.
    Wilhelm BM; Beck FM; Lidral AC; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 11298313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential growth of the female face in the anteroposterior dimension.
    Nanda SK
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 1554159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The craniofacial architecture of class III malocclusion using the Coben analysis].
    Vallée-Cussac V
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():995-1018. PubMed ID: 1842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of 15 year old children with excellent occlusion and with crowding of the teeth, Angle Class I malocclusion, in respect of face size and shape and tooth size.
    Adams CP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():11-26. PubMed ID: 6963765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.
    Polat OO; Kaya B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17973688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of patient age and sex on treatment: correction of Class II malocclusion with the Begg technique.
    Harris EF
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):433-41. PubMed ID: 11771781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A longitudinal 3-dimensional size and shape comparison of untreated Class I and Class II subjects.
    Palomo JM; Hunt DW; Hans MG; Broadbent BH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):584-91. PubMed ID: 15877039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.