429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26477880)
1. Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
Xiong WL; Li R; Lei HK; Jiang ZY
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Mar; 87(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 26477880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection?
Li XK; Xu Y; Zhou H; Cong ZZ; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Shen Y
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 32582945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer: propensity score matching analysis of 169 cases.
Xie J; Zhang L; Liu Z; Lu CL; Xu GH; Guo M; Lian X; Liu JQ; Zhang HW; Zheng SY
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):52. PubMed ID: 35216598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Yibulayin W; Abulizi S; Lv H; Sun W
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 14(1):304. PubMed ID: 27927246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Zhou C; Zhang L; Wang H; Ma X; Shi B; Chen W; He J; Wang K; Liu P; Ren Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132889. PubMed ID: 26196135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Siaw-Acheampong K; Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Singh P; Griffiths EA
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):787-803. PubMed ID: 32894001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Akhtar NM; Chen D; Zhao Y; Dane D; Xue Y; Wang W; Zhang J; Sang Y; Chen C; Chen Y
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 32310341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
