341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26478956)
21. The consistent image--how to improve the quality of dental radiographs: 2. The image receptor, processing and darkroom/film handling.
Carmichael F
Dent Update; 2006; 33(1):39-40, 42. PubMed ID: 16512097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Image salvage in panoramic radiography using histogram optimization.
Ogawa M; Tanimoto K; Kodera Y; Suei Y; Taguchi A; Tomita S; Furuki Y; Fujita M; Wada T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 1936424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Guide to Digital Radiographic Imaging.
Mol A; Yoon DC
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):503-11. PubMed ID: 26820007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Panoramic radiography: digital technology fosters efficiency.
Benson BW; Liang H; Flint DJ
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32 Spec No 4():6-8. PubMed ID: 22195340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography.
Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Bou Serhal C; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 11641728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
Kullman L; Joseph B
Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Image quality in multidetector CT of paranasal sinuses: potential of dose reduction using an adaptive post-processing filter].
Kröpil P; Cohnen M; Andersen K; Heinen W; Stegmann V; Mödder U
Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):973-8. PubMed ID: 20721848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The subjective image quality of conventional and digital panoramic radiography among 6 to 10 year old children.
Makris N; Tsiklakis K; Alexiou KE; Vierrou AM; Stefaniotis T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17315805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shall I go digital?
Thomas BL; Davies J; Whaites E
Dent Update; 2014 May; 41(4):314-6, 319-22, 325-6. PubMed ID: 24930253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of rare earth filtration on patient exposure, dose reduction, and image quality in oral panoramic radiology.
Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3804740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital radiography: the standard of care.
Samaras CD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):506, 508-9. PubMed ID: 18935789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction.
Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
