These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26478956)

  • 41. Clinical and in vitro film quality comparison of manual and automatic exposure control in panoramic radiography.
    Eraso FE; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall D; Phillips C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Apr; 87(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 10225638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
    Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
    J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice.
    van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Oct; 136(10):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16255462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reduction of absorbed dose in storage phosphor urography by significant lowering of tube voltage and adjustment of image display parameters.
    Wiltz HJ; Petersen U; Axelsson B
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Jul; 46(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 16134316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Image quality in partially erased DenOptix storage phosphor plates.
    Lopes SL; Cruz AD; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18425250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality.
    Sund T; Møystad A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16618843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pre-clinical evaluation of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on tomosynthesis method.
    Noujeim M; Prihoda T; McDavid WD; Ogawa K; Yamakawa T; Seki K; Okano T; Sue T; Langlais RP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Jan; 40(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 21159914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Updated quality assurance self-assessment exercise in intraoral and panoramic radiography. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Radiology Practice Committee.
    Goren AD; Lundeen RC; Deahl ST; Hashimoto K; Kapa SF; Katz JO; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Van Der Stelt PF; Wolfgang L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10710465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The impact of digital image processing artefacts mimicking pathological features associated with restorations.
    Brettle D; Carmichael F
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 21869791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on a tomosynthesis method.
    Ogawa K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Noujeim M; Seki K; Okano T; Yamakawa T; Sue T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jan; 39(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 20089744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rare-earth filters in panoramic radiography: a means of reducing patient dose without compromising image quality.
    Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3460901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT.
    Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rare earth filters for intraoral radiography: exposure reduction as a function of kV(p) with comparisons of image quality.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 May; 118(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 2715547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.