These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26479583)
1. Social provocation modulates decision making and feedback processing: Examining the trajectory of development in adolescent participants. Pincham HL; Wu C; Killikelly C; Vuillier L; Fearon RM Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 15():58-66. PubMed ID: 26479583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychosocial intervention in at-risk adolescents: using event-related potentials to assess changes in decision making and feedback processing. Pincham HL; Bryce D; Fonagy P; Fearon RMP Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2019 Feb; 28(2):223-236. PubMed ID: 29802517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frontal cortex electrophysiology in reward- and punishment-related feedback processing during advice-guided decision making: An interleaved EEG-DC stimulation study. Wischnewski M; Bekkering H; Schutter DJLG Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):249-262. PubMed ID: 29380293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do we trust strangers? The neural correlates of decision making and outcome evaluation of generalized trust. Wang Y; Zhang Z; Jing Y; Valadez EA; Simons RF Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1666-76. PubMed ID: 27317927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Behavioural and neural limits in competitive decision making: The roles of outcome, opponency and observation. Dyson BJ; Steward BA; Meneghetti T; Forder L Biol Psychol; 2020 Jan; 149():107778. PubMed ID: 31593749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study. Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Juveniles with a history of violent behavior show cognitive performance and electrophysiology consistent with inhibitory control and emotional feedback processing problems. Chen CY; Chiou CR; Ko CH Aggress Behav; 2019 Jan; 45(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 30203416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An electrophysiological index of outcome evaluation that may influence subsequent cooperation and aggression strategies. Yuan B; Wang Y; Roberts K; Valadez E; Yin J; Li W Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):420-433. PubMed ID: 30035674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. Li P; Jia S; Feng T; Liu Q; Suo T; Li H Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1727-33. PubMed ID: 20452440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of trait empathy on reactive aggression: An ERP study. Song P; Zhang Z; Wang B; David N; Zhao H; Wang Q; Xiao Y; Yang B Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Nov; 133():102-110. PubMed ID: 30092243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feedback and reward processing in high-functioning autism. Larson MJ; South M; Krauskopf E; Clawson A; Crowley MJ Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):198-203. PubMed ID: 21122921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revenge is sweet: Investigation of the effects of Approach-Motivated anger on the RewP in the motivated anger delay (MAD) paradigm. Threadgill AH; Gable PA Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(17):5032-5056. PubMed ID: 32856760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blunted feedback processing during risk-taking in adolescents with features of problematic Internet use. Yau YH; Potenza MN; Mayes LC; Crowley MJ Addict Behav; 2015 Jun; 45():156-63. PubMed ID: 25679363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study. Wischnewski M; Schutter DJLG Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement. Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex differences in the neural underpinnings of social and monetary incentive processing during adolescence. Greimel E; Bakos S; Landes I; Töllner T; Bartling J; Kohls G; Schulte-Körne G Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):296-312. PubMed ID: 29442284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis. Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1295-309. PubMed ID: 25453608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fairness influences early signatures of reward-related neural processing. Massi B; Luhmann CC Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 25962511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motivated to win: Relationship between anticipatory and outcome reward-related neural activity. Pornpattananangkul N; Nusslock R Brain Cogn; 2015 Nov; 100():21-40. PubMed ID: 26433773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]