These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26481062)

  • 1. Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Mele L; Carnevale UA; Irregolare C; Lanza A; Femiano F; Bifani M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 26481062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of IOP obtained in different kind of eyes with contact and no contact tonometers.
    Sbordone S; Ragucci A; Iaccarino G; Scognamiglio G; Leone A; Carnevale UAG; Lanza M
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 36760919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices.
    Lanza M; Rinaldi M; Carnevale UAG; di Staso S; Sconocchia MB; Costagliola C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 30176825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating Intraocular Pressure After Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Comparison of Different Tonometers.
    Lanza M; Sbordone S; Tortori A; Gironi Carnevale UA; Melillo P; Simonelli F
    J Glaucoma; 2022 Jun; 31(6):406-412. PubMed ID: 35394466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas.
    Ozbek Z; Cohen EJ; Hammersmith KM; Rapuano CJ
    Cornea; 2006 Sep; 25(8):890-4. PubMed ID: 17102662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses.
    Roszkowska AM; De Grazia L; Cirone M; Ferreri G
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 19321977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Cennamo M; Irregolare C; Romano V; Carnevale UA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 25467287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes.
    Meyenberg A; Iliev ME; Eschmann R; Frueh BE
    Cornea; 2008 Apr; 27(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 18362658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.
    Zare M; Feizi S; Azimzadeh A; Esfandiari H
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 37(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22577762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Sadigh AL; Fouladi RF; Hashemi H; Beheshtnejad AH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 22940796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1637-42. PubMed ID: 22789494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
    Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.
    Unterlauft JD; Schädle N; Kasper K; Klink T; Geerling G
    Cornea; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 21716097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.