223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26481124)
1. Comparison of tip apex distance and cut-out complications between helical blades and lag screws in intertrochanteric fractures among the elderly: a meta-analysis.
Li S; Chang SM; Niu WX; Ma H
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Nov; 20(6):1062-9. PubMed ID: 26481124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?
Ibrahim I; Appleton PT; Wixted JJ; DeAngelis JP; Rodriguez EK
Injury; 2019 Apr; 50(4):926-930. PubMed ID: 30885393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.
Buyukdogan K; Caglar O; Isik S; Tokgozoglu M; Atilla B
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):414-418. PubMed ID: 27889112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ng M; Shah NS; Golub I; Ciminero M; Zhai K; Kang KK; Emara AK; Piuzzi NS
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Dec; 32(8):1617-1625. PubMed ID: 34665292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?
Kuhl M; Beimel C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 32496321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?
Yoo J; Kim S; Choi J; Hwang J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 14(1):440. PubMed ID: 31842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures.
Geller JA; Saifi C; Morrison TA; Macaulay W
Int Orthop; 2010 Jun; 34(5):719-22. PubMed ID: 19618186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws.
Li S; Chang SM; Jin YM; Zhang YQ; Niu WX; Du SC; Zhang LZ; Ma H
Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1302-8. PubMed ID: 27087281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tip to apex distance in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review.
Rubio-Avila J; Madden K; Simunovic N; Bhandari M
J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jul; 18(4):592-8. PubMed ID: 23636573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Measuring method of tip-apex distance in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation].
Wang H; Wang Y; Yan B; Zhong L; Jiang J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 28(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 24693779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do PFNA devices and Intertan nails both have the same effects in the treatment of trochanteric fractures? A prospective clinical study.
Seyhan M; Turkmen I; Unay K; Ozkut AT
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Nov; 20(6):1053-61. PubMed ID: 26197959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic Review of Helical Blade Versus Lag Screw Fixation for Cephalomedullary Nailing of Low-Energy Peritrochanteric Femur Fractures: There is a Difference in Cutout.
Stern LC; Gorczyca JT; Kates S; Ketz J; Soles G; Humphrey CA
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jun; 31(6):305-310. PubMed ID: 28346314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II.
Shin YS; Chae JE; Kang TW; Han SB
Injury; 2017 Jul; 48(7):1550-1557. PubMed ID: 28433451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.
Park SY; Yang KH; Yoo JH; Yoon HK; Park HW
J Trauma; 2008 Oct; 65(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 18849802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of helical blade versus lag screw in intertrochanteric fractures of the elderly treated with proximal femoral nail: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
Huang J; Wei Q
Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2022; 33(3):695-704. PubMed ID: 36345200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is helical blade superior to screw design in terms of cut-out rate for elderly trochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Huang X; Leung F; Liu M; Chen L; Xu Z; Xiang Z
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Dec; 24(8):1461-8. PubMed ID: 24557412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison.
Zehir S; Zehir R; Zehir S; Azboy İ; Haykir N
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 26037995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures.
Ciufo DJ; Zaruta DA; Lipof JS; Judd KT; Gorczyca JT; Ketz JP
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Nov; 31(11):583-588. PubMed ID: 28827502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A newly designed locked intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures fixation: results of the first 100 Trochanteric implantations.
Loubignac F; Chabas JF
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Apr; 95(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19345659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Utility of the Tip-Apex Distance in Predicting Axial Migration and Cutout With the Trochanteric Fixation Nail System Helical Blade.
Flores SA; Woolridge A; Caroom C; Jenkins M
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Jun; 30(6):e207-11. PubMed ID: 26655519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
