BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26481244)

  • 1. A methodology for comprehensive breast cancer Ki67 labeling index with intra-tumor heterogeneity appraisal based on hexagonal tiling of digital image analysis data.
    Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Besusparis J; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Iqbal Y; Laurinavicius A
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 26481244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bimodality of intratumor Ki67 expression is an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Besusparis J; Augulis R; Meskauskas R; Herlin P; Laurinaviciene A; Abdelhadi Muftah AA; Miligy I; Aleskandarany M; Rakha EA; Green AR; Ellis IO
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Apr; 468(4):493-502. PubMed ID: 26818835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intratumoral heterogeneity of Ki67 proliferation index outperforms conventional immunohistochemistry prognostic factors in estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.
    Zilenaite-Petrulaitiene D; Rasmusson A; Besusparis J; Valkiuniene RB; Augulis R; Laurinaviciene A; Plancoulaine B; Petkevicius L; Laurinavicius A
    Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38217716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer.
    Besusparis J; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Augulis R; Green AR; Ellis IO; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2016 Aug; 11(1):82. PubMed ID: 27576949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
    Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Independent Prognostic Value of Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immune Response Features by Automated Digital Immunohistochemistry Analysis in Early Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Carcinoma.
    Zilenaite D; Rasmusson A; Augulis R; Besusparis J; Laurinaviciene A; Plancoulaine B; Ostapenko V; Laurinavicius A
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():950. PubMed ID: 32612954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital immunohistochemistry wizard: image analysis-assisted stereology tool to produce reference data set for calibration and quality control.
    Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 25565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated Selection of Hotspots (ASH): enhanced automated segmentation and adaptive step finding for Ki67 hotspot detection in adrenal cortical cancer.
    Lu H; Papathomas TG; van Zessen D; Palli I; de Krijger RR; van der Spek PJ; Dinjens WN; Stubbs AP
    Diagn Pathol; 2014 Nov; 9():216. PubMed ID: 25421287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Heterogeneity Improves the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
    Zhang M; Tan C; Wang X; Ding X; Zhang B; Yang Z; Wang Y; Sheng W; Huang D
    Mod Pathol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):100017. PubMed ID: 36788066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immune Response Indicators to Predict Overall Survival in a Retrospective Study of HER2-Borderline (IHC 2+) Breast Cancer Patients.
    Radziuviene G; Rasmusson A; Augulis R; Grineviciute RB; Zilenaite D; Laurinaviciene A; Ostapenko V; Laurinavicius A
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():774088. PubMed ID: 34858854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.
    Robertson S; Acs B; Lippert M; Hartman J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32572716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between Ki67 labeling index determined using image analysis software with virtual slide system and that determined visually in breast cancer.
    Maeda I; Abe K; Koizumi H; Nakajima C; Tajima S; Aoki H; Tsuchiya J; Tsuchiya S; Tsuchiya K; Shimo A; Tsugawa K; Ueno T; Tatsunami S; Takagi M
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 26271611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital Validation in Breast Cancer Needle Biopsies: Comparison of Histological Grade and Biomarker Expression Assessment Using Conventional Light Microscopy, Whole Slide Imaging, and Digital Image Analysis.
    Choi JE; Kim KH; Lee Y; Kang DW
    J Pers Med; 2024 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38541054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.
    Tang LH; Gonen M; Hedvat C; Modlin IM; Klimstra DS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1761-70. PubMed ID: 23026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An adaptive positivity thresholding method for automated Ki67 hotspot detection (AKHoD) in breast cancer biopsies.
    Pilutti D; Della Mea V; Pegolo E; La Marra F; Antoniazzi F; Di Loreto C
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Nov; 61():28-34. PubMed ID: 28499621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.
    Acs B; Pelekanou V; Bai Y; Martinez-Morilla S; Toki M; Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL
    Lab Invest; 2019 Jan; 99(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 30181553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Arun I; Venkatesh S; Ahmed R; Agrawal SK; Leung SCY
    APMIS; 2021 Aug; 129(8):489-502. PubMed ID: 34053140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proliferation assessment in breast carcinomas using digital image analysis based on virtual Ki67/cytokeratin double staining.
    Røge R; Riber-Hansen R; Nielsen S; Vyberg M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 27283833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.