BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26481889)

  • 1. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study.
    Ghogre P; Chourasia HR; Agarwal M; Singh MP; Gurav S; Ghogre R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 26481889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
    Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of apical bacterial extrusion following root canal instrumentation using different endodontic file systems: An
    Vankayala B; Anantula K; Saladi H; Gudugunta L; Basavarajaiah JM; Yadav SS
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):559-563. PubMed ID: 33088065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of apically extruded bacteria associated with different nickel-titanium systems.
    Türker SA; Uzunoğlu E; Aslan MH
    J Endod; 2015 Jun; 41(6):953-5. PubMed ID: 25799537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical extrusion of bacteria when using reciprocating single-file and rotary multifile instrumentation systems.
    Tinoco JM; De-Deus G; Tinoco EM; Saavedra F; Fidel RA; Sassone LM
    Int Endod J; 2014 Jun; 47(6):560-6. PubMed ID: 24111671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Mohammadi Z
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of various endodontic instrumentation systems on the amount of apically extruded bacteria - An
    Sahni G; Garg N; Chhabra A; Negi S; Gupta S; Chhabra V
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):270-274. PubMed ID: 33551598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical reduction of the intracanal Enterococcus faecalis population by Hyflex CM, K3XF, ProTaper Next, and two manual instrument systems: an in vitro comparative study.
    Tewari RK; Ali S; Mishra SK; Kumar A; Andrabi SM; Zoya A; Alam S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 May; 7(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 25424649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study.
    Taneja S; Kumari M; Barua M; Dudeja C; Malik M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 25961619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E. faecalis within root canals.
    Basmaci F; Oztan MD; Kiyan M
    Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 23441862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An
    Kalra P; Rao A; Suman E; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Feb; 9(2):e254-e258. PubMed ID: 28210445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the extruded bacteria following use of two rotary instrumentation systems.
    Mohammadi Z; Khademi A
    Iran Endod J; 2007; 2(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 24298285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of working length and apical preparation size on apical bacterial extrusion during reciprocating instrumentation.
    Teixeira JM; Cunha FM; Jesus RO; Silva EJ; Fidel SR; Sassone LM
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jul; 48(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 25087922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria with Single File and Multifile Rotary Instrumentation Systems.
    Saberi E; Zahedani SS; Ebrahimipour S
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017; 7(5):292-296. PubMed ID: 29026702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Üreyen Kaya B; Erik CE; Sesli Çetin E; Köle M; Maden M
    Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29985531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal.
    Gorduysus M; Nagas E; Torun OY; Gorduysus O
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 22117720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Apical Bacterial Extrusion in Manual, ProTaper Rotary, and One Shape Rotary Instrumentation Techniques.
    Mittal R; Singla MG; Garg A; Dhawan A
    J Endod; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 26472680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.