BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26482553)

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness of a Biopsy-Based 8-Protein Prostate Cancer Prognostic Assay to Optimize Treatment Decision Making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
    Roth JA; Ramsey SD; Carlson JJ
    Oncologist; 2015 Dec; 20(12):1355-64. PubMed ID: 26482553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
    de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-Utility of a Prognostic Test Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Stenehjem DD; Bellows BK; Yager KM; Jones J; Kaldate R; Siebert U; Brixner DI
    Oncologist; 2016 Feb; 21(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 26614710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-Effectiveness of Urinary Biomarker Panel in Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Govers TM; Caba L; Resnick MJ
    J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 30012363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of SelectMDx for prostate cancer in four European countries: a comparative modeling study.
    Govers TM; Hessels D; Vlaeminck-Guillem V; Schmitz-Dräger BJ; Stief CG; Martinez-Ballesteros C; Ferro M; Borque-Fernando A; Rubio-Briones J; Sedelaar JPM; van Criekinge W; Schalken JA
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Mar; 22(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30127462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Selective Treatment Strategies.
    Roth JA; Gulati R; Gore JL; Cooperberg MR; Etzioni R
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):890-8. PubMed ID: 27010943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of a new urinary biomarker-based risk score compared to standard of care in prostate cancer diagnostics - a decision analytical model.
    Dijkstra S; Govers TM; Hendriks RJ; Schalken JA; Van Criekinge W; Van Neste L; Grutters JPC; Sedelaar JPM; van Oort IM
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):659-665. PubMed ID: 28370948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating Biomarkers into the Primary Prostate Biopsy Setting: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Sathianathen NJ; Kuntz KM; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk NL; Bolton DM; Murphy DG; Weight CJ; Konety BR
    J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 29906434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.
    Sathianathen NJ; Konety BR; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Kuntz KM
    Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 30425010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the NADiA ProsVue slope to guide adjuvant radiotherapy among men with high-risk characteristics following prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Reed SD; Stewart SB; Scales CD; Moul JW
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):545-54. PubMed ID: 25128047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of degarelix for advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer.
    Lu L; Peters J; Roome C; Stein K
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(8):1183-92. PubMed ID: 21883830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decision analysis comparing 3 active surveillance protocols for the treatment of patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
    White C; Nimeh T; Gazelle GS; Weinstein MC; Loughlin KR
    Cancer; 2019 Mar; 125(6):952-962. PubMed ID: 30561761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of the Decipher Genomic Classifier to Guide Individualized Decisions for Early Radiation Therapy After Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.
    Lobo JM; Trifiletti DM; Sturz VN; Dicker AP; Buerki C; Davicioni E; Cooperberg MR; Karnes RJ; Jenkins RB; Den RB; Showalter TN
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Jun; 15(3):e299-e309. PubMed ID: 28089723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer.
    Boyd KA; Jones RJ; Paul J; Birrell F; Briggs AH; Leung HY
    BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e007925. PubMed ID: 26482768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia.
    Keller A; Gericke C; Whitty JA; Yaxley J; Kua B; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Feb; 15(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 27757918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost Effectiveness of the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score for Guiding Treatment Decisions in Patients With Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
    Chang EM; Punglia RS; Steinberg ML; Raldow AC
    Urology; 2019 Apr; 126():89-95. PubMed ID: 30580007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A decision support model for cost-effectiveness of radical prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer.
    Lyth J; Andersson SO; Andrén O; Johansson JE; Carlsson P; Shahsavar N
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Feb; 46(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 21905981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of localized and advanced prostate cancer in Canada: A lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life-year analysis.
    Sanyal C; Aprikian AG; Cury FL; Chevalier S; Dragomir A
    Cancer; 2016 Apr; 122(7):1085-96. PubMed ID: 26828716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health-economic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer].
    Stadlbauer A; Bernt R; Salomonowitz E; Plas E; Strunk G; Eberhardt K
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):925-32. PubMed ID: 21863536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
    Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.