311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26483028)
1. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics in Yeast.
Léger T; Garcia C; Videlier M; Camadro JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():289-307. PubMed ID: 26483028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An exclusion list based label-free proteome quantification approach using an LTQ Orbitrap.
Muntel J; Hecker M; Becher D
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 Mar; 26(6):701-9. PubMed ID: 22328225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast.
de Godoy LM; Olsen JV; Cox J; Nielsen ML; Hubner NC; Fröhlich F; Walther TC; Mann M
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7217):1251-4. PubMed ID: 18820680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-depth comparative proteomic analysis of yeast proteome using iTRAQ and SWATH based MS.
Basak T; Bhat A; Malakar D; Pillai M; Sengupta S
Mol Biosyst; 2015 Aug; 11(8):2135-43. PubMed ID: 26099114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SWATH enables precise label-free quantification on proteome scale.
Huang Q; Yang L; Luo J; Guo L; Wang Z; Yang X; Jin W; Fang Y; Ye J; Shan B; Zhang Y
Proteomics; 2015 Apr; 15(7):1215-23. PubMed ID: 25560523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. i-RUBY: a novel software for quantitative analysis of highly accurate shotgun-proteomics liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry data obtained without stable-isotope labeling of proteins.
Wada K; Ogiwara A; Nagasaka K; Tanaka N; Komatsu Y
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2011 Apr; 25(7):960-8. PubMed ID: 21416533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of empirical rule of linearly correlated peptide selection (ERLPS) for proteotypic peptide-based quantitative proteomics.
Liu K; Zhang J; Fu B; Xie H; Wang Y; Qian X
Proteomics; 2014 Jul; 14(13-14):1593-603. PubMed ID: 24827140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data.
Mueller LN; Brusniak MY; Mani DR; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2008 Jan; 7(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18173218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LFQuant: a label-free fast quantitative analysis tool for high-resolution LC-MS/MS proteomics data.
Zhang W; Zhang J; Xu C; Li N; Liu H; Ma J; Zhu Y; Xie H
Proteomics; 2012 Dec; 12(23-24):3475-84. PubMed ID: 23081734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring protein structural changes on a proteome-wide scale using limited proteolysis-coupled mass spectrometry.
Schopper S; Kahraman A; Leuenberger P; Feng Y; Piazza I; Müller O; Boersema PJ; Picotti P
Nat Protoc; 2017 Nov; 12(11):2391-2410. PubMed ID: 29072706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neutron-encoded mass signatures for multiplexed proteome quantification.
Hebert AS; Merrill AE; Bailey DJ; Still AJ; Westphall MS; Strieter ER; Pagliarini DJ; Coon JJ
Nat Methods; 2013 Apr; 10(4):332-4. PubMed ID: 23435260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative protein quantification and accessible biology in lung tumor proteomes from four LC-MS/MS discovery platforms.
Stewart PA; Fang B; Slebos RJ; Zhang G; Borne AL; Fellows K; Teer JK; Chen YA; Welsh E; Eschrich SA; Haura EB; Koomen JM
Proteomics; 2017 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28195392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deglycosylation systematically improves N-glycoprotein identification in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry proteomics for analysis of cell wall stress responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking Alg3p.
Bailey UM; Schulz BL
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2013 Apr; 923-924():16-21. PubMed ID: 23454304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A proteome-integrated, carbon source dependent genetic regulatory network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Garcia-Albornoz M; Holman SW; Antonisse T; Daran-Lapujade P; Teusink B; Beynon RJ; Hubbard SJ
Mol Omics; 2020 Feb; 16(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 31868867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics.
Zhang B; VerBerkmoes NC; Langston MA; Uberbacher E; Hettich RL; Samatova NF
J Proteome Res; 2006 Nov; 5(11):2909-18. PubMed ID: 17081042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chromatogram libraries improve peptide detection and quantification by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
Searle BC; Pino LK; Egertson JD; Ting YS; Lawrence RT; MacLean BX; Villén J; MacCoss MJ
Nat Commun; 2018 Dec; 9(1):5128. PubMed ID: 30510204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Translational value of liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of drug metabolism and transport and considerations in selecting appropriate techniques.
Al Feteisi H; Achour B; Rostami-Hodjegan A; Barber J
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2015; 11(9):1357-69. PubMed ID: 26108733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of proteins by label-free LC-MS/MS.
Levin Y; Bahn S
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 658():217-31. PubMed ID: 20839107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Global Comparative Label-Free Yeast Proteome Analysis by LC-MS/MS After High-pH Reversed-Phase Peptide Fractionation Using Solid-Phase Extraction Cartridges.
Zaman K; Pandey P; Shulaev V; Prokai L
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2396():71-84. PubMed ID: 34786677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The APEX Quantitative Proteomics Tool: generating protein quantitation estimates from LC-MS/MS proteomics results.
Braisted JC; Kuntumalla S; Vogel C; Marcotte EM; Rodrigues AR; Wang R; Huang ST; Ferlanti ES; Saeed AI; Fleischmann RD; Peterson SN; Pieper R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():529. PubMed ID: 19068132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
