These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26483077)

  • 1. Microhabitat locality allows multi-species coexistence in terrestrial plant communities.
    Tubay JM; Suzuki K; Uehara T; Kakishima S; Ito H; Ishida A; Yoshida K; Mori S; Rabajante JF; Morita S; Yokozawa M; Yoshimura J
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15376. PubMed ID: 26483077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resistance of a terrestrial plant community to local microhabitat changes.
    Tubay JM; Yoshimura J
    Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(10):5101-5110. PubMed ID: 29876085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-species coexistence in Lotka-Volterra competitive systems with crowding effects.
    Gavina MKA; Tahara T; Tainaka KI; Ito H; Morita S; Ichinose G; Okabe T; Togashi T; Nagatani T; Yoshimura J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1198. PubMed ID: 29352250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.
    Adler PB; Smull D; Beard KH; Choi RT; Furniss T; Kulmatiski A; Meiners JM; Tredennick AT; Veblen KE
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 29938882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multitrait successional forest dynamics enable diverse competitive coexistence.
    Falster DS; Brännström Å; Westoby M; Dieckmann U
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Mar; 114(13):E2719-E2728. PubMed ID: 28283658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The survival analysis of a stochastic Lotka-Volterra competition model with a coexistence equilibrium.
    Xiong JJ; Li X; Wang H
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Mar; 16(4):2717-2737. PubMed ID: 31137234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental evidence rejects pairwise modelling approach to coexistence in plant communities.
    Dormann CF; Roxburgh SH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Jun; 272(1569):1279-85. PubMed ID: 16024393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does local spatial structure hinder competitive coexistence and reverse competitive hierarchies?
    Murrell DJ
    Ecology; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1605-16. PubMed ID: 20583703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The three-species problem: Incorporating competitive asymmetry and intransitivity in modern coexistence theory.
    Ranjan R; Koffel T; Klausmeier CA
    Ecol Lett; 2024 Apr; 27(4):e14426. PubMed ID: 38603592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coexistence of species with different dispersal across landscapes: a critical role of spatial correlation in disturbance.
    Liao J; Ying Z; Woolnough DA; Miller AD; Li Z; Nijs I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 May; 283(1830):. PubMed ID: 27147101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities?
    Michalet R; Brooker RW; Cavieres LA; Kikvidze Z; Lortie CJ; Pugnaire FI; Valiente-Banuet A; Callaway RM
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Jul; 9(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 16796565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating eco-evolutionary dynamics and modern coexistence theory.
    Yamamichi M; Gibbs T; Levine JM
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Oct; 25(10):2091-2106. PubMed ID: 35962483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecological communities.
    Calleja-Solanas V; Khalil N; Gómez-Gardeñes J; Hernández-García E; Meloni S
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Dec; 106(6-1):064307. PubMed ID: 36671121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An excess of niche differences maximizes ecosystem functioning.
    Godoy O; Gómez-Aparicio L; Matías L; Pérez-Ramos IM; Allan E
    Nat Commun; 2020 Aug; 11(1):4180. PubMed ID: 32826915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habitat heterogeneity mediates effects of individual variation on spatial species coexistence.
    Chen D; Liao J; Bearup D; Li Z
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1919):20192436. PubMed ID: 31964303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid transgenerational adaptation in response to intercropping reduces competition.
    Stefan L; Engbersen N; Schöb C
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36097813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence.
    Laird RA; Schamp BS
    Am Nat; 2006 Aug; 168(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 16874628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emergent niche structuring leads to increased differences from neutrality in species abundance distributions.
    Rael RC; D'Andrea R; Barabás G; Ostling A
    Ecology; 2018 Jul; 99(7):1633-1643. PubMed ID: 29655259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences.
    Godoy O; Stouffer DB; Kraft NJB; Levine JM
    Ecology; 2017 May; 98(5):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 28241383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks?
    Laird RA; Schamp BS
    Ecology; 2008 Jan; 89(1):237-47. PubMed ID: 18376565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.