137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2648316)
1. Paradigms of science/society interaction: the abortion controversy.
Singleton R
Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(2):174-93. PubMed ID: 2648316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: round 1.
Dworkin R; Kay J; Schnaubelt CM; Orlans H; Rabinowitz S; Bienenstock AH; Bork ME; Lewy G; Hyde HJ; Singer SF; Gellman M; Ewy CR; Gow HB; Jenks BP; Olson E; Wile F; Cohn RG; Oakes ET; Elshtain JB; Wilson JQ
Commentary; 1994 Mar; 97(3):2-19. PubMed ID: 11659743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
Parness JA
West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion.
Moore EN
Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nor piety nor wit: the Supreme Court on abortion.
Dellapenna JW
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):379-413. PubMed ID: 11663599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Logic, law and abortion.
Degnan M; Pannier R
Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Witherspoon JS
St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
Kindregan CP
Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
Martyn K
UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977.
U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Homo sapienism: critique of Roe v. Wade and abortion.
Lewis JL
Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):856-93. PubMed ID: 11661205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity.
Roden GJ
Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On abortion.
Wilson JQ
Commentary; 1994 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 11656254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-identification and the morality of abortion.
Lusby K
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
