These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26484592)

  • 21. Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: application to uterine electromyogram signals.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):980-6. PubMed ID: 21497127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterization of EHG contractions at term labor by nonlinear analysis.
    Garcia-Gonzalez MT; Charleston-Villalobos S; Vargas-Garcia C; Gonzalez-Camarena R; Aljama-Corrales T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7432-5. PubMed ID: 24111463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Synchronization in the bivariate intrauterine pressure signals' nonlinear dynamics methods.
    Oczeretko E; Borowska M; Kitlas A; Laudanski P; Laudanski T
    Reprod Sci; 2010 Jul; 17(7):667-72. PubMed ID: 20404355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uterine electromyography during active phase compared with latent phase of labor at term.
    Trojner Bregar A; Lucovnik M; Verdenik I; Jager F; Gersak K; Garfield RE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Feb; 95(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 26575523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach.
    Jezewski J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Wrobel J
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Oct; 26(5):753-67. PubMed ID: 16088066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Synchronization analysis of the uterine magnetic activity during contractions.
    Ramon C; Preissl H; Murphy P; Wilson JD; Lowery C; Eswaran H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Oct; 4():55. PubMed ID: 16197557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
    de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic identification of motion artifacts in EHG recording for robust analysis of uterine contractions.
    Ye-Lin Y; Garcia-Casado J; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Perales A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():470786. PubMed ID: 24523828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dedicated Entropy Measures for Early Assessment of Pregnancy Progression From Single-Channel Electrohysterography.
    Mischi M; Chen C; Ignatenko T; de Lau H; Ding B; Oei SGG; Rabotti C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Apr; 65(4):875-884. PubMed ID: 28692959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; Busowski JD; Euliano N; Gregg AR
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 26960704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uterine activity monitoring during labor.
    Bakker PC; Van Rijswijk S; van Geijn HP
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 18052832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonlinear estimation of coupling and directionality between signals: application to uterine EMG propagation.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Boudaoud S; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4366-9. PubMed ID: 24110700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving the classification rate of labor vs. normal pregnancy contractions by using EHG multichannel recordings.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4642-5. PubMed ID: 21096236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
    Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. M-mode Ultrasound Scan as a Potential Alternative Technique for Monitoring Uterine Contractions in Obese Patients.
    Ince O; Karaca SY; Karaca I
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Jul; 28(7):1989-1995. PubMed ID: 33442847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Could electrohysterography be the solution for external uterine monitoring in obese women?
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    J Perinatol; 2018 May; 38(5):580-586. PubMed ID: 29467514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Low-complexity intrauterine pressure monitoring by Teager energy estimation.
    Rooijakkers MJ; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Aarts RM; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7424-7. PubMed ID: 24111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour.
    Jacod BC; Graatsma EM; Van Hagen E; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.