BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26485294)

  • 1. Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():115-24. PubMed ID: 26485294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intragastric fat self-administration is impaired in GPR40/120 double knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Touzani K; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Aug; 147():141-8. PubMed ID: 25911263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jun; 106(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 22445944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats.
    Sclafani A; Fanizza LJ; Azzara AV
    Physiol Behav; 1999 Aug; 67(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 10477054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2014 Dec; 307(12):R1448-57. PubMed ID: 25320345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning by glucose and fat in the mouse.
    Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2011 Dec; 301(6):R1635-47. PubMed ID: 21975648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats.
    Sclafani A; Cardieri C; Tucker K; Blusk D; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol; 1993 Aug; 265(2 Pt 2):R320-5. PubMed ID: 8368385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose.
    Azzara AV; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 9761229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.
    Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2013 Jan; 109():33-41. PubMed ID: 23200639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.
    Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2017 Mar; 42(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 28158517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.
    Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2013 Oct; 305(7):R840-53. PubMed ID: 23926132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency.
    Ackroff K; Touzani K; Peets TK; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2001 Apr; 72(5):691-703. PubMed ID: 11337001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():23-31. PubMed ID: 25484359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Jun; 133():92-8. PubMed ID: 24811140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditioned preference and avoidance induced in mice by the rare sugars isomaltulose and allulose.
    Sclafani A; Castillo A; Carata I; Pines R; Berglas E; Joseph S; Sarker J; Nashed M; Roland M; Arzayus S; Williams N; Glendinning JI; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2023 Aug; 267():114221. PubMed ID: 37146897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Apr; 129():64-72. PubMed ID: 24582671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric ethanol with limited access training.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2003 Apr; 75(1):223-33. PubMed ID: 12759131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.