These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26487189)

  • 41. Calculation of the standard binding free energy of sparsomycin to the ribosomal peptidyl-transferase P-site using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials.
    Ge X; Roux B
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(2):128-41. PubMed ID: 20151411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Configurational preferences of arylamide α-helix mimetics via alchemical free energy calculations of relative binding affinities.
    Fuller JC; Jackson RM; Shirts MR
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Sep; 116(35):10856-69. PubMed ID: 22920218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Is ring breaking feasible in relative binding free energy calculations?
    Liu S; Wang L; Mobley DL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25835054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Qgui: A high-throughput interface for automated setup and analysis of free energy calculations and empirical valence bond simulations in biological systems.
    Isaksen GV; Andberg TA; Åqvist J; Brandsdal BO
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Jul; 60():15-23. PubMed ID: 26080356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. To Design Scalable Free Energy Perturbation Networks, Optimal Is Not Enough.
    Pitman M; Hahn DF; Tresadern G; Mobley DL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Mar; 63(6):1776-1793. PubMed ID: 36878475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Binding Free Energies of Host-Guest Systems by Nonequilibrium Alchemical Simulations with Constrained Dynamics: Illustrative Calculations and Numerical Validation.
    Giovannelli E; Cioni M; Procacci P; Cardini G; Pagliai M; Volkov V; Chelli R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):5887-5899. PubMed ID: 29112430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling Using Generalized AMBER Force-Field Topologies: Application to Relative Hydration Free-Energy Calculations for Large Sets of Molecules.
    Rieder SR; Ries B; Schaller K; Champion C; Barros EP; Hünenberger PH; Riniker S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(12):3043-3056. PubMed ID: 35675713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Performance of Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations on an Automatically Generated Dataset of Halogen-Deshalogen Matched Molecular Pairs.
    Cappel D; Mozziconacci JC; Braun T; Steinbrecher T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jul; 61(7):3421-3430. PubMed ID: 34170707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. BAT2: an Open-Source Tool for Flexible, Automated, and Low Cost Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Heinzelmann G; Huggins DJ; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Aug; 20(15):6518-6530. PubMed ID: 39088306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can System Truncation Speed up Ligand-Binding Calculations with Periodic Free-Energy Simulations?
    Manzoni F; Uranga J; Genheden S; Ryde U
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov; 57(11):2865-2873. PubMed ID: 29076739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fast and flexible gpu accelerated binding free energy calculations within the amber molecular dynamics package.
    Mermelstein DJ; Lin C; Nelson G; Kretsch R; McCammon JA; Walker RC
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Jul; 39(19):1354-1358. PubMed ID: 29532496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Enabling grand-canonical Monte Carlo: extending the flexibility of GROMACS through the GromPy python interface module.
    Pool R; Heringa J; Hoefling M; Schulz R; Smith JC; Feenstra KA
    J Comput Chem; 2012 May; 33(12):1207-14. PubMed ID: 22370965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Standard Binding Free-Energy Calculations: How Far Are We from Automation?
    Fu H; Chipot C; Shao X; Cai W
    J Phys Chem B; 2023 Dec; 127(49):10459-10468. PubMed ID: 37824848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics and Rao-Blackwell Estimator for Alchemical Free Energy Calculation.
    Ding X; Vilseck JZ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jun; 13(6):2501-2510. PubMed ID: 28510433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A challenging system: free energy prediction for factor Xa.
    Wallnoefer HG; Liedl KR; Fox T
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1743-52. PubMed ID: 21374633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Molecular dynamics simulation by GROMACS using GUI plugin for PyMOL.
    Makarewicz T; Kaźmierkiewicz R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 May; 53(5):1229-34. PubMed ID: 23611462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance and Analysis of the Alchemical Transfer Method for Binding-Free-Energy Predictions of Diverse Ligands.
    Chen L; Wu Y; Wu C; Silveira A; Sherman W; Xu H; Gallicchio E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jan; 64(1):250-264. PubMed ID: 38147877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Biasing Potential Replica Exchange Multisite λ-Dynamics for Efficient Free Energy Calculations.
    Armacost KA; Goh GB; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Mar; 11(3):1267-77. PubMed ID: 26579773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Structural Determinants for the Binding of Morphinan Agonists to the μ-Opioid Receptor.
    Cong X; Campomanes P; Kless A; Schapitz I; Wagener M; Koch T; Carloni P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135998. PubMed ID: 26280453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accurate calculation of conformational free energy differences in explicit water: the confinement-solvation free energy approach.
    Esque J; Cecchini M
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Apr; 119(16):5194-207. PubMed ID: 25807150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.