These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26487189)
81. Lessons learned from comparing molecular dynamics engines on the SAMPL5 dataset. Shirts MR; Klein C; Swails JM; Yin J; Gilson MK; Mobley DL; Case DA; Zhong ED J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):147-161. PubMed ID: 27787702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Free energy calculations for molecular solids using GROMACS. Aragones JL; Noya EG; Valeriani C; Vega C J Chem Phys; 2013 Jul; 139(3):034104. PubMed ID: 23883007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Orthogonal sampling in free-energy calculations of residue mutations in a tripeptide: TI versus λ-LEUS. Bieler NS; Hünenberger PH J Comput Chem; 2015 Aug; 36(22):1686-97. PubMed ID: 26154740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. NE-RDFE: A protocol and toolkit for computing relative dissociation free energies with GROMACS between dissimilar molecules using bidirectional nonequilibrium dual topology schemes. Macchiagodena M; Pagliai M; Procacci P J Comput Chem; 2023 May; 44(12):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 36704972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors. Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Assessment of Binding Affinity via Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations. Kuhn M; Firth-Clark S; Tosco P; Mey ASJS; Mackey M; Michel J J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):3120-3130. PubMed ID: 32437145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Minimum MD simulation length required to achieve reliable results in free energy perturbation calculations: case study of relative binding free energies of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors. Rathore RS; Aparoy P; Reddanna P; Kondapi AK; Reddy MR J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2097-103. PubMed ID: 21503928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Protocol for calculating binding free energy of RNA:RNA interactions through molecular dynamics simulations using adaptive biasing force technique. Kameda T; Saha DK; Ray S; Togashi Y; Asano K STAR Protoc; 2024 Sep; 5(3):103223. PubMed ID: 39083381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Gmx_qk: An Automated Protein/Protein-Ligand Complex Simulation Workflow Bridged to MM/PBSA, Based on Gromacs and Zenity-Dependent GUI for Beginners in MD Simulation Study. Singh H; Raja A; Prakash A; Medhi B J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(9):2603-2608. PubMed ID: 37079775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Free-energy differences between states with different conformational ensembles. Garate JA; Oostenbrink C J Comput Chem; 2013 Jun; 34(16):1398-408. PubMed ID: 23526629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Free Energy Calculations using a Swarm-Enhanced Sampling Molecular Dynamics Approach. Burusco KK; Bruce NJ; Alibay I; Bryce RA Chemphyschem; 2015 Oct; 16(15):3233-41. PubMed ID: 26418190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Discovery and optimization of triazine derivatives as ROCK1 inhibitors: molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. Shen M; Zhou S; Li Y; Pan P; Zhang L; Hou T Mol Biosyst; 2013 Mar; 9(3):361-74. PubMed ID: 23340525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Multistate Method to Efficiently Account for Tautomerism and Protonation in Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations. Champion C; Hünenberger PH; Riniker S J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 May; 20(10):4350-4362. PubMed ID: 38742760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]