BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26487986)

  • 1. Does Television Viewership Predict Presidential Election Outcomes?
    Barfar A; Padmanabhan B
    Big Data; 2015 Sep; 3(3):138-147. PubMed ID: 26487986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes from What People Watch.
    Barfar A; Padmanabhan B
    Big Data; 2017 Mar; 5(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 28328251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public interest in Cannabis during election season: a Google Trends analysis.
    Torgerson T; Roberts W; Lester D; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
    J Cannabis Res; 2020 Sep; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 33526135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving election prediction internationally.
    Kennedy R; Wojcik S; Lazer D
    Science; 2017 Feb; 355(6324):515-520. PubMed ID: 28154078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exposure to televised political campaign advertisements aired in the United States 2015-2016 election cycle and psychological distress.
    Niederdeppe J; Avery RJ; Liu J; Gollust SE; Baum L; Barry CL; Welch B; Tabor E; Lee NW; Fowler EF
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 May; 277():113898. PubMed ID: 33848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guns In Political Advertising Over Four US Election Cycles, 2012-18.
    Barry CL; Bandara S; Fowler EF; Baum L; Gollust SE; Niederdeppe J; Hendricks AK
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2020 Feb; 39(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 32011931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology with bootstrap percentile estimates for predicting presidential election results in Ghana.
    Nortey EN; Ansah-Narh T; Asah-Asante R; Minkah R
    Springerplus; 2015; 4():525. PubMed ID: 26435890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election.
    Mohammadi S; Moradi P; Firouzabadi SM; Jafari G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270822. PubMed ID: 35900976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
    Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving Predictive Accuracy in Elections.
    Sathiaraj D; Cassidy WM; Rohli E
    Big Data; 2017 Dec; 5(4):325-336. PubMed ID: 29235914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.
    Gao M; Wang Z; Wang K; Liu C; Tang S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270194. PubMed ID: 35771877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baseline comparative analysis and review of election forensics: Application to Ghana's 2012 and 2020 presidential elections.
    Agyemang EF; Nortey ENN; Minkah R; Asah-Asante K
    Heliyon; 2023 Aug; 9(8):e18276. PubMed ID: 37576298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion and the presidential election of 1976: a multivariate analysis of voting behavior.
    Vinovskis MA
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1750-71. PubMed ID: 10245970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.