These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26488150)

  • 1. Cement Selection for Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Literature Review.
    Nematollahi F; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Oct; 25(7):599-606. PubMed ID: 26488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the Best Available Luting Agent for Implant Prosthesis?
    Almehmadi N; Kutkut A; Al-Sabbagh M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):531-545. PubMed ID: 31097143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
    Chaar MS; Att W; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 21395638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Newly Designed Screw- and Cement-Retained Prosthesis and Its Abutments.
    Heo YK; Lim YJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):612-4. PubMed ID: 26523721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
    Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of flow conditions of adhesives and retention force of restorations among four cement-retained methods of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
    Sun B; Li YJ; Meng ZL; Cao Q; Duan LL; Yao N; Zhou Q
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):469-474. PubMed ID: 31288327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techniques for locating the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review.
    Martín Ortega N; Baños MÁ; Martínez J; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 34809995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peri-implant bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Brandão ML; Vettore MV; Vidigal Júnior GM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 23297703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical observation of screw and cement-retained implant-supported restoration of fixed bridges].
    Song T; Xu PC; Li Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Jun; 20(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 21779741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.
    Shadid R; Sadaqa N
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 21091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses.
    Millen C; Brägger U; Wittneben JG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 25615920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Update of the Different Effects on Peri-implant Tissues by Screw- or Cement-retained Implant Restorations.
    Pagnoni F; Bramucci C; Bhandi S; Nardo DD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(9):859-860. PubMed ID: 37282989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An auxiliary device for screw-retained fixed implant restorations which prevents extrusion of cement into screw-access openings.
    Yang Z; Liu M; Liu X; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):178-180. PubMed ID: 32828529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications.
    Ma S; Fenton A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):127-45. PubMed ID: 25822297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
    Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.
    Wittneben JG; Joda T; Weber HP; Brägger U
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 28000276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.