These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26488363)

  • 21. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics.
    Motro PF; Kursoglu P; Kazazoglu E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 23031729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface Roughness and Hardness of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials after Polishing with a Multipurpose Polishing Kit: An In Vitro Study.
    Limpuangthip N; Poosanthanasarn E; Salimee P
    Eur J Dent; 2023 Oct; 17(4):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 36513337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surface roughness of five different dental ceramic core materials after grinding and polishing.
    Kou W; Molin M; Sjögren G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 16457671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on roughness and translucency of lithium disilicate ceramic.
    Monaco C; Arena A; Özcan M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2014; 34(1):e26-9. PubMed ID: 24396850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.
    Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of external and internal surface roughness modifications on ceramic flexural strength.
    Ruschel VC; Maia HP; Lopes GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 24819531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro staining effects of stannous fluoride and sodium fluoride on ceramic material.
    Artopoulou II; Powers JM; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20188238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of a paste-free prophylaxis polishing cup and various prophylaxis polishing pastes on tooth enamel and restorative materials.
    Covey DA; Barnes C; Watanabe H; Johnson WW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):466-73; quiz 474-5. PubMed ID: 22313918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems.
    Akar GC; Pekkan G; Çal E; Eskitaşçıoğlu G; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 24513427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Ohmiti K; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 20036418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Polishing Methods' Influence on Color Stability and Roughness of 2 Provisional Prosthodontic Materials.
    Soares IA; Leite PKBDS; Farias OR; Lemos GA; Batista AUD; Montenegro RV
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 30933395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of different polishing techniques for composite resin materials on surface properties and bacterial biofilm formation.
    Kurt A; Cilingir A; Bilmenoglu C; Topcuoglu N; Kulekci G
    J Dent; 2019 Nov; 90():103199. PubMed ID: 31557551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics.
    Kursoglu P; Karagoz Motro PF; Kazazoglu E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 24484857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds.
    Roeder LB; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15151337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.