These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26488615)

  • 1. Modulation of ERP components by task instructions in a cued go/no-go task.
    Aasen IE; Brunner JF
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 26488615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparing for (valenced) action: The role of differential effort in the orthogonalized go/no-go task.
    Schevernels H; Bombeke K; Krebs RM; Boehler CN
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 26481327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuropsychological parameters indexing executive processes are associated with independent components of ERPs.
    Brunner JF; Olsen A; Aasen IE; Løhaugen GC; Håberg AK; Kropotov J
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():144-56. PubMed ID: 25448863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-dose effects on the P3no-go ERP component predict clinical response to stimulants in pediatric ADHD.
    Ogrim G; Aasen IE; Brunner JF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Oct; 127(10):3277-87. PubMed ID: 27567447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-lasting effects of performance-contingent unconscious and conscious reward incentives during cued task-switching.
    Capa RL; Bouquet CA; Dreher JC; Dufour A
    Cortex; 2013; 49(7):1943-54. PubMed ID: 22770561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teasing apart the anticipatory and consummatory processing of monetary incentives: An event-related potential study of reward dynamics.
    Novak KD; Foti D
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1470-82. PubMed ID: 26223291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task preparation processes related to reward prediction precede those related to task-difficulty expectation.
    Schevernels H; Krebs RM; Santens P; Woldorff MG; Boehler CN
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():639-47. PubMed ID: 24064071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task.
    Vuillier L; Bryce D; Szücs D; Whitebread D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165697. PubMed ID: 27814356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance and ERP components in the equiprobable go/no-go task: Inhibition in children.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1228-37. PubMed ID: 25959726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parafac and go/no-go: disentangling CNV return from the P3 complex by trilinear component analysis.
    Verleger R; Paulick C; Möcks J; Smith JL; Keller K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 22902314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information processing differences and similarities in adults with dyslexia and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder during a Continuous Performance Test: a study of cortical potentials.
    Dhar M; Been PH; Minderaa RB; Althaus M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3045-56. PubMed ID: 20600194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
    Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.