These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26488615)

  • 21. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term test-retest reliability of the P3 NoGo wave and two independent components decomposed from the P3 NoGo wave in a visual Go/NoGo task.
    Brunner JF; Hansen TI; Olsen A; Skandsen T; Håberg A; Kropotov J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23770084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ERPs on a continuous performance task and self-reported psychopathic traits: P3 and CNV augmentation are associated with Fearless Dominance.
    Carlson SR; Thái S
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):318-30. PubMed ID: 20723576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition.
    Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR; van der Molen MW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):266-79. PubMed ID: 14634814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: an ERP and fMRI study.
    Smith JL; Jamadar S; Provost AL; Michie PT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 22885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clarifying the sequential processes involved in a cued continuous performance test.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ; de Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jan; 52(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 25039827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contingent negative variation (CNV) associated with sensorimotor timing error correction.
    Jang J; Jones M; Milne E; Wilson D; Lee KH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():58-66. PubMed ID: 26666899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sequence effects in cued task switching modulate response preparedness and repetition priming processes.
    Jamadar S; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):365-86. PubMed ID: 20003149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Short-Term Effect of Video Editing Pace on Children's Inhibition and N2 and P3 ERP Components during Visual Go/No-Go Task.
    Kostyrka-Allchorne K; Cooper NR; Kennett S; Nestler S; Simpson A
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2019 Jul; 44(4):385-396. PubMed ID: 31203657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatiotemporal characterization of response inhibition.
    Albert J; López-Martín S; Hinojosa JA; Carretié L
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():272-81. PubMed ID: 23523776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task.
    Jonkman LM; Lansbergen M; Stauder JE
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Sep; 40(5):752-61. PubMed ID: 14696728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution.
    Boehm U; van Maanen L; Forstmann B; van Rijn H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():95-105. PubMed ID: 24699015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.