These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26488615)

  • 41. A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 23182873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Electrophysiological evidence for preparatory reconfiguration before voluntary task switches but not cued task switches.
    Kang MS; Diraddo A; Logan GD; Woodman GF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 23979831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The spatial and temporal dynamics of anticipatory preparation and response inhibition in task-switching.
    Jamadar S; Hughes M; Fulham WR; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):432-49. PubMed ID: 20123028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of prefrontal activity during the preparatory period on success or failure of response inhibition in the stop-signal task.
    Takayose M; Koshizawa R; Oki K; Kikuchi T
    Neuroreport; 2016 Jun; 27(9):665-70. PubMed ID: 27159416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Resting state intrinsic EEG impacts on go stimulus-response processes.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):894-903. PubMed ID: 28258583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: electroencephalographic evidence of task-set inertia in oculomotor control.
    Weiler J; Hassall CD; Krigolson OE; Heath M
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():323-9. PubMed ID: 25453741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Attention and inhibition in children with ASD, ADHD and co-morbid ASD + ADHD: an event-related potential study.
    Tye C; Asherson P; Ashwood KL; Azadi B; Bolton P; McLoughlin G
    Psychol Med; 2014 Apr; 44(5):1101-16. PubMed ID: 23673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Arousal-state modulation in children with AD/HD.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 120(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 19027356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Response inhibition is more effortful than response activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Gao H; Qi M; Zhang Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 May; 28(7):404-407. PubMed ID: 28272263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Functional indexes of reactive cognitive control: ERPs in cued go/no-go tasks.
    Kropotov JD; Ponomarev VA; Pronina M; Jäncke L
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1899-1915. PubMed ID: 28771747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Preparation for action: an ERP study about two tasks provoking variability in response speed.
    Wascher E; Verleger R; Jaskowski P; Wauschkuhn B
    Psychophysiology; 1996 May; 33(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 8936395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Event-related brain potentials during the visuomotor mental rotation task: The contingent negative variation scales to angle of rotation.
    Heath M; Hassall CD; MacLean S; Krigolson OE
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 311():153-65. PubMed ID: 26477986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.