195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26489791)
1. Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department.
Stanescu AL; Parisi MT; Weinberger E; Ferguson MR; Otto RK; Iyer RS
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 26489791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review comments augment diagnostic error characterization and departmental quality assurance: 1-year experience from a children's hospital.
Iyer RS; Swanson JO; Otto RK; Weinberger E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 23255752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.
Iyer RS; Munsell A; Weinberger E
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 24948210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.
Swanson JO; Thapa MM; Iyer RS; Otto RK; Weinberger E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22528902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.
Halsted MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):984-7. PubMed ID: 17411742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.
Moriarity AK; Hawkins CM; Geis JR; Dreyer KJ; Kamer AP; Khandheria P; Morey J; Whitfill J; Wiggins RH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 28233533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Error Categorization at Abdominal Imaging Peer Learning Conference.
Del Gaizo AJ; Itri JN; Pendergrast TE; Tappouni R
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(6):535-542. PubMed ID: 30244814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. RADPEER scoring white paper.
Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review in clinical radiology practice.
Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The art of communication: strategies to improve efficiency, quality of care and patient safety in the emergency department.
Krug SE
Pediatr Radiol; 2008 Nov; 38 Suppl 4():S655-9. PubMed ID: 18810415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology.
Provenzale JM; Kranz PG
Emerg Radiol; 2011 Oct; 18(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 21786138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mitigating Misdiagnosis in Radiology: Educational CT CME Case Conference for Peer Review and Interpretative Improvement.
Johnson PT; Badger D; Horton KM; Fishman EK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1244-1246. PubMed ID: 27474418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of a Technologist-Centered Electronic Review and Feedback System on Image Quality.
Chung JH; Haas K; Liu L; Zhu W; Geyer M; Chang PJ; Katzman GL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1437-1442. PubMed ID: 29503147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Just Culture: Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review.
Burns J; Miller T; Weiss JM; Erdfarb A; Silber D; Goldberg-Stein S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Mar; 16(3):384-388. PubMed ID: 30584040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey of peer review programs among pediatric radiologists: report from the SPR Quality and Safety Committee.
Iyer RS; Swenson DW; Anand N; Blumfield E; Chandra T; Chavhan GB; Goodman TR; Khan N; Moore MM; Ngo TD; Sammet CL; Sze RW; Vera CD; Stanescu AL
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):517-525. PubMed ID: 30923884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologist Peer Review by Group Consensus.
Harvey HB; Alkasab TK; Prabhakar AM; Halpern EF; Rosenthal DI; Pandharipande PV; Gazelle GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jun; 13(6):656-62. PubMed ID: 26908200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output.
Alkasab TK; Harvey HB; Gowda V; Thrall JH; Rosenthal DI; Gazelle GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 24139321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Process improvement: what is it, why is it important, and how is it done?
Johnson CD; Miranda R; Aakre KT; Roberts CC; Patel MD; Krecke KN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):461-8. PubMed ID: 20093610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
