110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26490190)
1. Evaluation of Statistical Treatments of Left-Censored Environmental Data Using Coincident Uncensored Data Sets. II. Group Comparisons.
Antweiler RC
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13439-46. PubMed ID: 26490190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics.
Antweiler RC; Taylor HE
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(10):3732-8. PubMed ID: 18546715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating Left-Censored Data Through Substitution, Parametric, Semi-parametric, and Nonparametric Methods: A Simulation Study.
Tekindal MA; Erdoğan BD; Yavuz Y
Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Jun; 9(2):153-172. PubMed ID: 26590921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical Techniques to Analyze Pesticide Data Program Food Residue Observations.
Szarka AZ; Hayworth CG; Ramanarayanan TS; Joseph RSI
J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Jul; 66(27):7165-7171. PubMed ID: 29902006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
Newton E; Rudel R
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distorted correlations among censored data: causes, effects, and correction.
Barchard KA; Russell JA
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1207-1228. PubMed ID: 38129736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of censored exposure data by constrained maximization of the Shapiro-Wilk W statistic.
Flynn MR
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 19955326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for analysis of censored tumor growth delay data.
Stuschke M; Budach V; Bamberg M; Budach W
Radiat Res; 1990 May; 122(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 2336463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generalized pairwise comparisons for censored data: An overview.
Deltuvaite-Thomas V; Verbeeck J; Burzykowski T; Buyse M; Tournigand C; Molenberghs G; Thas O
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100354. PubMed ID: 36127290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Censoring Trace-Level Environmental Data: Statistical Analysis Considerations to Limit Bias.
George BJ; Gains-Germain L; Broms K; Black K; Furman M; Hays MD; Thomas KW; Simmons JE
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 55(6):3786-3795. PubMed ID: 33625843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of lognormally distributed exposure data with repeated measures and values below the limit of detection using SAS.
Jin Y; Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Hines CJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 21177260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
