These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26490294)
1. Estimating cut points: A simple method for new wearables. Hickey A; Newham J; Slawinska MM; Kwasnicka D; McDonald S; Del Din S; Sniehotta FF; Davis PA; Godfrey A Maturitas; 2016 Jan; 83():78-82. PubMed ID: 26490294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of sedentary time and physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis: an ActiGraph and activPAL™ validation study. O'Brien CM; Duda JL; Kitas GD; Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS; Metsios GS; Fenton SAM Rheumatol Int; 2020 Sep; 40(9):1509-1518. PubMed ID: 32472303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults. Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Kronish IM; Moise N; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE J Sports Sci; 2018 Jan; 36(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 28282744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach. Nnamoko N; Cabrera-Diego LA; Campbell D; Sanders G; Fairclough SJ; Korkontzelos I Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106165. PubMed ID: 34118492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examination of different accelerometer cut-points for assessing sedentary behaviors in children. Kim Y; Lee JM; Peters BP; Gaesser GA; Welk GJ PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90630. PubMed ID: 24699259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer. Welch WA; Bassett DR; Thompson DL; Freedson PS; Staudenmayer JW; John D; Steeves JA; Conger SA; Ceaser T; Howe CA; Sasaki JE; Fitzhugh EC Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Oct; 45(10):2012-9. PubMed ID: 23584403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points. Boerema ST; Essink GB; Tönis TM; van Velsen L; Hermens HJ Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 26712758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer. Colley RC; Tremblay MS J Sports Sci; 2011 May; 29(8):783-9. PubMed ID: 21424979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of wrist-worn and hip-worn activity monitors under free living conditions. Hargens TA; Deyarmin KN; Snyder KM; Mihalik AG; Sharpe LE J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):200-207. PubMed ID: 28078908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration and validation of physical behaviour cut-points using wrist-worn ActiGraphs for children and adolescents: A systematic review. Clanchy K; Stanfield M; Smits E; Liimatainen J; Ritchie C J Sci Med Sport; 2024 Feb; 27(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 38087661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults? Hart TL; Swartz AM; Cashin SE; Strath SJ Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2011 Jun; 8():62. PubMed ID: 21679426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibrating Wrist-Worn Accelerometers for Physical Activity Assessment in Preschoolers: Machine Learning Approaches. Li S; Howard JT; Sosa ET; Cordova A; Parra-Medina D; Yin Z JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16727. PubMed ID: 32667893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers. Rowlands AV; Rennie K; Kozarski R; Stanley RM; Eston RG; Parfitt GC; Olds TS Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults. Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Montoye AHK J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2794-2802. PubMed ID: 32755446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children. Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometery for Estimating Movement Skills in Children Aged 8-12 Years. Duncan MJ; Dobell A; Noon M; Clark CCT; Roscoe CMP; Faghy MA; Stodden D; Sacko R; Eyre ELJ Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 32414192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparability of published cut-points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization. Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Tudor-Locke C; Löf M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Molina-Garcia P; Mora-Gonzalez J; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Garcia-Marmol E; Ekelund U; Ortega FB Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Apr; 29(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 30548545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children. van Cauwenberghe E; Labarque V; Trost SG; de Bourdeaudhuij I; Cardon G Int J Pediatr Obes; 2011 Jun; 6(2-2):e582-9. PubMed ID: 21121867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults. Lee P; Tse CY Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]