These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26490294)
21. Cross-validation of Actigraph derived accelerometer cut-points for assessment of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in children aged 8-11 years. Duncan MJ; Eyre ELJ; Cox V; Roscoe CMP; Faghy MA; Tallis J; Dobell A Acta Paediatr; 2020 Sep; 109(9):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 31984545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing the validity and reliability and determining cut-points of the Actiwatch 2 in measuring physical activity. Kemp C; Pienaar PR; Henst RHP; Roden LC; Kolbe-Alexander TL; Rae DE Physiol Meas; 2020 Sep; 41(8):085001. PubMed ID: 32886650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Calibration and validation of the ActiGraph GT3X+ in 2-3 year olds. Costa S; Barber SE; Cameron N; Clemes SA J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Nov; 17(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 24365695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cut points of the Actigraph GT9X for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity at four different wear locations. Rhudy MB; Dreisbach SB; Moran MD; Ruggiero MJ; Veerabhadrappa P J Sports Sci; 2020 Mar; 38(5):503-510. PubMed ID: 31865845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of the MyWellness Key accelerometer in people with type 2 diabetes. McGinley SK; Armstrong MJ; Khandwala F; Zanuso S; Sigal RJ Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 Nov; 40(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 26489052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Discrepancies in accelerometer-measured physical activity in children due to cut-point non-equivalence and placement site. Routen AC; Upton D; Edwards MG; Peters DM J Sports Sci; 2012; 30(12):1303-10. PubMed ID: 22856351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Wrist Accelerometry for Physical Activity Measurement in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury-A Need for Individually Calibrated Cut-Points. McCracken LA; Ma JK; Voss C; Chan FH; Martin Ginis KA; West CR Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Apr; 99(4):684-689. PubMed ID: 29222006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of self-reported and device-assessed physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Lines RLJ; Ntoumanis N; Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; McVeigh JA; Ducker KJ; Fletcher D; Gucciardi DF J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Sep; 23(9):831-835. PubMed ID: 32312612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study. Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wrist Accelerometer Cut Points for Classifying Sedentary Behavior in Children. VAN Loo CM; Okely AD; Batterham MJ; Hinkley T; Ekelund U; Brage S; Reilly JJ; Trost SG; Jones RA; Janssen X; Cliff DP Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr; 49(4):813-822. PubMed ID: 27851669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validity of a wrist-worn consumer-grade wearable for estimating energy expenditure, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Bailey DP; Ahmed I; Cooper DL; Finlay KA; Froome HM; Nightingale TE; Romer LM; Goosey-Tolfrey VL; Ferrandino L Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Sep; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 39301994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Pilot Study Validating Select Research-Grade and Consumer-Based Wearables Throughout a Range of Dynamic Exercise Intensities in Persons With and Without Type 1 Diabetes: A Novel Approach. Yavelberg L; Zaharieva D; Cinar A; Riddell MC; Jamnik V J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 May; 12(3):569-576. PubMed ID: 29320885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of a physical activity accelerometer device worn on the hip and wrist against polysomnography. Full KM; Kerr J; Grandner MA; Malhotra A; Moran K; Godoble S; Natarajan L; Soler X Sleep Health; 2018 Apr; 4(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 29555136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. Pulsford RM; Cortina-Borja M; Rich C; Kinnafick FE; Dezateux C; Griffiths LJ PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e21822. PubMed ID: 21853021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of raw acceleration cut-points for wrist and hip accelerometers to assess sedentary behaviour and physical activity in 5-7-year-old children. Crotti M; Foweather L; Rudd JR; Hurter L; Schwarz S; Boddy LM J Sports Sci; 2020 May; 38(9):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 32228156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Calibration and cross-validation of a wrist-worn Actigraph in young preschoolers. Johansson E; Ekelund U; Nero H; Marcus C; Hagströmer M Pediatr Obes; 2015 Feb; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24408275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of Physical Activity Intensity in Spinal Cord Injury Using a Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Monitor. Veerubhotla A; Hong E; Knezevic S; Spungen A; Ding D Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 101(9):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 32502566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5-8 years old. Duncan MJ; Wilson S; Tallis J; Eyre E Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 175(12):2019-2021. PubMed ID: 27785561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Separating bedtime rest from activity using waist or wrist-worn accelerometers in youth. Tracy DJ; Xu Z; Choi L; Acra S; Chen KY; Buchowski MS PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92512. PubMed ID: 24727999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]