284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26490770)
1. The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes.
Keller DS; Pedraza R; Flores-Gonzalez JR; LeFave JP; Mahmood A; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3321-6. PubMed ID: 26490770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Open Colectomies of Shorter Operative Time Do Not Result in Improved Outcomes Compared With Prolonged Laparoscopic Operations.
Zettervall SL; Haskins IN; Deery SE; Amdur RL; Lin PP; Vaziri K
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Oct; 27(5):361-365. PubMed ID: 28731952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are right-sided colectomy outcomes different from left-sided colectomy outcomes?: study of patients with colon cancer in the ACS NSQIP database.
Kwaan MR; Al-Refaie WB; Parsons HM; Chow CJ; Rothenberger DA; Habermann EB
JAMA Surg; 2013 Jun; 148(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 23754534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.
Keller DS; Parikh N; Senagore AJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 27572064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do the advantages of a minimally invasive approach remain in complex colorectal procedures? A nationwide comparison.
Schlussel AT; Lustik MB; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Champagne BJ; Goldberg JE; Steele SR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Apr; 58(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 25751800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.
Delaney CP; Chang E; Senagore AJ; Broder M
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18438119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis.
Dolejs SC; Waters JA; Ceppa EP; Zarzaur BL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2387-2396. PubMed ID: 27655383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A National Database Analysis Comparing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomies: Inherent Variance May Impact Outcomes.
Schlussel AT; Delaney CP; Maykel JA; Lustik MB; Nishtala M; Steele SR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Sep; 59(9):843-54. PubMed ID: 27505113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.
Bennett CL; Stryker SJ; Ferreira MR; Adams J; Beart RW
Arch Surg; 1997 Jan; 132(1):41-4; discussion 45. PubMed ID: 9006551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes after Laparoscopic vs Robotic Colectomy.
Miller PE; Dao H; Paluvoi N; Bailey M; Margolin D; Shah N; Vargas HD
J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Aug; 223(2):369-73. PubMed ID: 27109780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopy improves failure to rescue compared to open surgery for emergent colectomy.
Patel R; Patel KS; Alvarez-Downing MM; Merchant AM
Updates Surg; 2020 Sep; 72(3):835-844. PubMed ID: 32519206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic assisted colectomy: experience from a rural centre.
Guo DY; Eteuati J; Nguyen MH; Lloyd D; Ragg JL
ANZ J Surg; 2007 Apr; 77(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 17388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005-2008.
Ozhathil DK; Li Y; Smith JK; Witkowski E; Coyne ER; Alavi K; Tseng JF; Shah SA
J Surg Res; 2011 Nov; 171(1):e9-13. PubMed ID: 21872886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic
Alharthi S; Reilly M; Arishi A; Ahmed AM; Chulkov M; Qu W; Ortiz J; Nazzal M; Pannell S
Am Surg; 2020 Mar; 86(3):256-260. PubMed ID: 32223807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?
Midura EF; Hanseman DJ; Davis BR; Johnson BL; Kuethe JW; Rafferty JF; Paquette IM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3567-72. PubMed ID: 26541737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.
Keller DS; Qiu J; Kiran RP
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Oct; 23(10):965-972. PubMed ID: 31598786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study.
Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis: a case-matched analysis from a nationwide database.
Onder A; Benlice C; Church J; Kessler H; Gorgun E
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Nov; 20(11):767-773. PubMed ID: 27783175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
