483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26490860)
21. Correlation between audio-visual enhancement of speech in different noise environments and SNR: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.
Liu B; Lin Y; Gao X; Dang J
Neuroscience; 2013 Sep; 247():145-51. PubMed ID: 23673276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The timing of visual speech modulates auditory neural processing.
Sato M
Brain Lang; 2022 Dec; 235():105196. PubMed ID: 36343508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Auditory-visual processing represented in the human superior temporal gyrus.
Reale RA; Calvert GA; Thesen T; Jenison RL; Kawasaki H; Oya H; Howard MA; Brugge JF
Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 17241747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. fMR-adaptation indicates selectivity to audiovisual content congruency in distributed clusters in human superior temporal cortex.
van Atteveldt NM; Blau VC; Blomert L; Goebel R
BMC Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 11():11. PubMed ID: 20122260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Different neural processes underlie visual speech perception in school-age children and adults: An event-related potentials study.
Kaganovich N; Ancel E
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Aug; 184():98-122. PubMed ID: 31015101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech.
Bourguignon M; Baart M; Kapnoula EC; Molinaro N
J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 31889007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual activation and audiovisual interactions in the auditory cortex during speech perception: intracranial recordings in humans.
Besle J; Fischer C; Bidet-Caulet A; Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Giard MH
J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 28(52):14301-10. PubMed ID: 19109511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) in audiovisual speech perception.
Pilling M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):1073-81. PubMed ID: 19641083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The elicitation of audiovisual steady-state responses: multi-sensory signal congruity and phase effects.
Jenkins J; Rhone AE; Idsardi WJ; Simon JZ; Poeppel D
Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):134-48. PubMed ID: 21380858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Look at me when I'm talking to you: Selective attention at a multisensory cocktail party can be decoded using stimulus reconstruction and alpha power modulations.
O'Sullivan AE; Lim CY; Lalor EC
Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 50(8):3282-3295. PubMed ID: 31013361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Generalizable EEG Encoding Models with Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.
Desai M; Holder J; Villarreal C; Clark N; Hoang B; Hamilton LS
J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(43):8946-8962. PubMed ID: 34503996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Audiovisual perception of natural speech is impaired in adult dyslexics: an ERP study.
Rüsseler J; Gerth I; Heldmann M; Münte TF
Neuroscience; 2015 Feb; 287():55-65. PubMed ID: 25534719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Top-down attention regulates the neural expression of audiovisual integration.
Morís Fernández L; Visser M; Ventura-Campos N; Ávila C; Soto-Faraco S
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():272-85. PubMed ID: 26119022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hearing-impaired listeners show increased audiovisual benefit when listening to speech in noise.
Puschmann S; Daeglau M; Stropahl M; Mirkovic B; Rosemann S; Thiel CM; Debener S
Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():261-268. PubMed ID: 30978494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The level of audiovisual print-speech integration deficits in dyslexia.
Kronschnabel J; Brem S; Maurer U; Brandeis D
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():245-61. PubMed ID: 25084224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perception based method for the investigation of audiovisual integration of speech.
Huhn Z; Szirtes G; Lorincz A; Csépe V
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Nov; 465(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 19733215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.
van Wassenhove V; Grant KW; Poeppel D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Jan; 102(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 15647358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.
Pratt H; Bleich N; Mittelman N
Brain Behav; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e00407. PubMed ID: 26664791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
