These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26490860)

  • 41. The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 26126803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do congruent lip movements facilitate speech processing in a dynamic audiovisual multi-talker scenario? An ERP study with older and younger adults.
    Begau A; Klatt LI; Wascher E; Schneider D; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113436. PubMed ID: 34175355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception.
    Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The whole is more than the sum of its parts - audiovisual processing of phonemes investigated with ERPs.
    Hessler D; Jonkers R; Stowe L; Bastiaanse R
    Brain Lang; 2013 Mar; 124(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 23395711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role of facial colour and luminance in visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    McCotter MV; Jordan TR
    Perception; 2003; 32(8):921-36. PubMed ID: 14580139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dissociated roles of the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in audiovisual processing: top-down and bottom-up mismatch detection.
    Uno T; Kawai K; Sakai K; Wakebe T; Ibaraki T; Kunii N; Matsuo T; Saito N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122580. PubMed ID: 25822912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How prior expectations shape multisensory perception.
    Gau R; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):876-886. PubMed ID: 26419391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Visual stimulus locking of EEG is modulated by temporal congruency of auditory stimuli.
    Schall S; Quigley C; Onat S; König P
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 198(2-3):137-51. PubMed ID: 19526359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.
    Kaplan E; Jesse A
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107724. PubMed ID: 31323242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Development of Cortical Responses to the Integration of Audiovisual Speech in Infancy.
    Dopierała AAW; Pérez DL; Mercure E; Pluta A; Malinowska-Korczak A; Evans S; Wolak T; Tomalski P
    Brain Topogr; 2023 Jul; 36(4):459-475. PubMed ID: 37171657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    Peelle JE; Spehar B; Jones MS; McConkey S; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34815317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of gaze on EEG measures of multisensory integration in a cocktail party scenario.
    Ahmed F; Nidiffer AR; Lalor EC
    bioRxiv; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37662393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of gaze on EEG measures of multisensory integration in a cocktail party scenario.
    Ahmed F; Nidiffer AR; Lalor EC
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1283206. PubMed ID: 38162285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Preference for Audiovisual Speech Congruency in Superior Temporal Cortex.
    Lüttke CS; Ekman M; van Gerven MA; de Lange FP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26351991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Haptic and visual information speed up the neural processing of auditory speech in live dyadic interactions.
    Treille A; Cordeboeuf C; Vilain C; Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():71-7. PubMed ID: 24530236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Noise alters beta-band activity in superior temporal cortex during audiovisual speech processing.
    Schepers IM; Schneider TR; Hipp JF; Engel AK; Senkowski D
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():101-12. PubMed ID: 23274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Responses to Visual Speech in Human Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Examined with iEEG Deconvolution.
    Metzger BA; Magnotti JF; Wang Z; Nesbitt E; Karas PJ; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 40(36):6938-6948. PubMed ID: 32727820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.