These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26491744)

  • 1. [Else Smith replies to Lotte Hvas: You do not break secrecy].
    Smith E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1985. PubMed ID: 26491744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reply: Our criticism is relevant].
    Hillingsø J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1983. PubMed ID: 26491742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Unfair criticism of the Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences].
    Miiller MM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1982. PubMed ID: 26491741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Improved questionnaire concerning the Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences].
    Watt Boolsen M; Plum LM; Hillingsø JG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1958-61. PubMed ID: 23978119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The quality of the survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences is questionable].
    Watt Boolsen M; Plum LM; Hillingsø JG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(35):1954-7. PubMed ID: 23978118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing and selecting patient satisfaction questionnaires.
    Trandel-Kornechuk DM
    Med Group Manage J; 1998; 45(3):66-8, 70, 72-7. PubMed ID: 10181641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys.
    Lasek RJ; Barkley W; Harper DL; Rosenthal GE
    Med Care; 1997 Jun; 35(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 9191708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of ENT consultant postal questionnaires.
    Ramphul N; Saunders J; Ahmed I; Fenton JE
    J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Mar; 119(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 15845186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Family surveys: measuring more than just satisfaction.
    Welk TA; Smith WB
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 1999; 16(3):533-40. PubMed ID: 10661061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Not listening to patients--the use and misuse of patient satisfaction studies.
    Crawford MJ; Kessel AS
    Int J Soc Psychiatry; 1999; 45(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10443244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Telltale heart skips a few beats: challenging conclusions of EMS customer satisfaction.
    Schears RM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Feb; 11(2):214; author reply 214-5. PubMed ID: 14759972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using survey methods in telehealth research: A practical guide.
    Langbecker D; Caffery LJ; Gillespie N; Smith AC
    J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Oct; 23(9):770-779. PubMed ID: 28728502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are patient-satisfaction surveys fair to doctors?
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 1996 Dec; 73(23):55-6, 59-60, 62 passim. PubMed ID: 10162659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specifics add value, usability to patient satisfaction surveys.
    Zablocki E
    Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1999 Feb; 2(2):13-5. PubMed ID: 10346220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of drug dependents' self-reports.
    Phelps DL; Cottler LB; Compton WM
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1998 Jan; 49(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 9543653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Worst practices in patient satisfaction measurement.
    Spath PL
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Mar; 31(3):40-3. PubMed ID: 16550840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability.
    Smith LF
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Mar; 10(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11239139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The scale product technique as a means of enhancing the measurement of patient satisfaction.
    Lynn MR; McMillen BJ
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Sep; 36(3):66-81. PubMed ID: 15551663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is this satisfaction survey satisfactory? Some points to consider in their planning and assessment.
    Bisset AF; Chesson R
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2000 Jan; 58(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 12813852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can we use patient-reported feedback to drive change? The challenges of using patient-reported feedback and how they might be addressed.
    Flott KM; Graham C; Darzi A; Mayer E
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Jun; 26(6):502-507. PubMed ID: 27325796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.