These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26491922)

  • 21. In Situ Cranioplasty Technique for Immediate Calvarial Reconstruction to Optimize Cosmesis.
    Gallia GL
    World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():535-9. PubMed ID: 26875659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simultaneous repair of two large cranial defects using rapid prototyping and custom computer-designed titanium plates: a case report.
    Morrison DA; Guy DT; Day RE; Lee GY
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Nov; 225(11):1108-12. PubMed ID: 22292209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Single-step fronto-orbital resection and reconstruction with individual resection template and corresponding titanium implant: a new method of computer-aided surgery.
    Eufinger H; Wittkampf AR; Wehmöller M; Zonneveld FW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Dec; 26(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 10036653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional reconstruction of cranial defect using active contour model and image registration.
    Liao YL; Lu CF; Sun YN; Wu CT; Lee JD; Lee ST; Wu YT
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Feb; 49(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 21128121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cranioplasty Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants for Skull Defects.
    Park EK; Lim JY; Yun IS; Kim JS; Woo SH; Kim DS; Shim KW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 27192643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reverse engineering techniques for cranioplasty: a case study.
    Maravelakis E; David K; Antoniadis A; Manios A; Bilalis N; Papaharilaou Y
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17852651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
    Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Customized titanium reconstruction of post-traumatic orbital wall defects: a review of 22 cases.
    Mustafa SF; Evans PL; Bocca A; Patton DW; Sugar AW; Baxter PW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1357-62. PubMed ID: 21885249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Custom implant design for large cranial defects.
    Marreiros FM; Heuzé Y; Verius M; Unterhofer C; Freysinger W; Recheis W
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2217-2230. PubMed ID: 27358081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Craniofacial reconstruction with computer-generated HTR patient-matched implants: use in primary bony tumor excision.
    Eppley BL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Sep; 13(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 12218793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Increasing the accuracy of orbital reconstruction with selective laser-melted patient-specific implants combined with intraoperative navigation.
    Rana M; Chui CH; Wagner M; Zimmerer R; Rana M; Gellrich NC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 25981837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printing Guide for Single-Stage Skull Bone Tumor Surgery: Novel Software Workflow with Manufacturing of Prefabricated Jigs for Bone Resection and Reconstruction.
    Wu CT; Lu TC; Chan CS; Lin TC
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Mar; 147():e416-e427. PubMed ID: 33359737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 3-D titanium mesh reconstruction of defective skull after frontal craniectomy in traumatic brain injury.
    Chen ST; Chang CJ; Su WC; Chang LW; Chu IH; Lin MS
    Injury; 2015 Jan; 46(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 25452005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-aided implant design for the restoration of cranial defects.
    Chen X; Xu L; Li X; Egger J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4199. PubMed ID: 28646207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures.
    Gander T; Essig H; Metzler P; Lindhorst D; Dubois L; Rücker M; Schumann P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 25465486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computer-assisted innovations in craniofacial surgery.
    Rudman K; Hoekzema C; Rhee J
    Facial Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 27(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 21792779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prefabricated prostheses for the reconstruction of skull defects.
    Eufinger H; Wehmöller M; Harders A; Heuser L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Feb; 24(1 Pt 2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7782644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Polymethyl Methacrylate Custom-Made Prosthesis: A Novel Three-Dimension Printing-Aided Fabrication Technique for Cranial and/or Orbital Reconstruction.
    Martinez-Seijas P; Díaz-Galvis LA; Hernando J; Leizaola-Cardesa IO; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gómez-Moreno G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):e438-e440. PubMed ID: 29521751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From computerized tomography data processing to rapid manufacturing of custom-made prostheses for cranioplasty. Case report.
    Solaro P; Pierangeli E; Pizzoni C; Boffi P; Scalese G
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2008 Dec; 52(4):113-6; discussion 116. PubMed ID: 18981986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative analysis of dual-purpose, patient-specific craniofacial implants for correction of temporal deformity.
    Zhong S; Huang GJ; Susarla SM; Swanson EW; Huang J; Gordon CR
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Jun; 11 Suppl 2():220-9; discussion 229. PubMed ID: 25710104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.