BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26492179)

  • 1. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
    Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
    Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
    Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An update of the Gleason grading system.
    Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 20006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Fine SW; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong Q; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Trpkov K
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 145(4):461-493. PubMed ID: 32589068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers.
    Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
    Int J Biol Markers; 2018 Nov; 33(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 29945478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].
    Kristiansen G; Egevad L; Amin M; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA; Epstein JI;
    Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26809207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
    Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
    APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
    Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
    Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate cancer with cribriform morphology: diagnosis, aggressiveness, molecular pathology and possible relationships with intraductal carcinoma.
    Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Gasparrini S; Mazzucchelli R; Santoni M; Massari F; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2018 Jul; 18(7):685-693. PubMed ID: 29699428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
    Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
    Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.
    Gordetsky J; Epstein J
    Diagn Pathol; 2016 Mar; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26956509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.
    Dong F; Wang C; Farris AB; Wu S; Lee H; Olumi AF; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 22592143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
    Kweldam CF; Nieboer D; Algaba F; Amin MB; Berney DM; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Bubendorf L; Cheng L; Compérat E; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Evans AJ; Hansel DE; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Tan PH; Varma M; Zhou M; van Leenders GJ
    Histopathology; 2016 Sep; 69(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 27028587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
    Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 122.