These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. Schwitalla AD; Abou-Emara M; Spintig T; Lackmann J; Müller WD J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25435385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximum insertion torque of a novel implant-abutment-interface design for PEEK dental implants. Schwitalla AD; Zimmermann T; Spintig T; Abou-Emara M; Lackmann J; Müller WD; Houshmand A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():85-89. PubMed ID: 28898725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can PEEK Be an Implant Material? Evaluation of Surface Topography and Wettability of Filled Versus Unfilled PEEK With Different Surface Roughness. Elawadly T; Radi IAW; El Khadem A; Osman RB J Oral Implantol; 2017 Dec; 43(6):456-461. PubMed ID: 29064768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. Lee WT; Koak JY; Lim YJ; Kim SK; Kwon HB; Kim MJ J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 May; 100(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 22331553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK in implant dentistry: A scoping review on the finite element method. Souza JCM; Pinho SS; Braz MP; Silva FS; Henriques B Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Sep; 24(12):1355-1367. PubMed ID: 33616450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. Schwitalla A; Müller WD J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):743-9. PubMed ID: 21905892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro degradation of a biodegradable polylactic acid/magnesium composite as potential bone augmentation material in the presence of titanium and PEEK dental implants. Zimmermann T; Ferrandez-Montero A; Lieblich M; Ferrari B; González-Carrasco JL; Müller WD; Schwitalla AD Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1492-1500. PubMed ID: 29941350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interfacial shear strength of bioactive-coated carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone after in vivo implantation. Nakahara I; Takao M; Goto T; Ohtsuki C; Hibino S; Sugano N J Orthop Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1618-25. PubMed ID: 22467537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fabrication and mechanical properties of different types of carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone: A comparative study. Zhou Z; Han X; Gao W; Li Y; Yu W; Yang S; Zhang J; Wang J; Shi R; Zhou Y; Zhao J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Nov; 135():105472. PubMed ID: 36162163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The long-term mechanical integrity of non-reinforced PEEK-OPTIMA polymer for demanding spinal applications: experimental and finite-element analysis. Ferguson SJ; Visser JM; Polikeit A Eur Spine J; 2006 Feb; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15940477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of carbon fiber type on monotonic and fatigue properties of orthopedic grade PEEK. Bonnheim N; Ansari F; Regis M; Bracco P; Pruitt L J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():484-492. PubMed ID: 30448562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review. Mishra S; Chowdhary R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):208-222. PubMed ID: 30589497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of argon/oxygen low-pressure plasma on shear bond strength between a veneering composite and different PEEK materials. Schwitalla AD; Bötel F; Zimmermann T; Sütel M; Müller WD Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):990-994. PubMed ID: 28655478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]