These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26492723)

  • 1. Differential processing of vertical interfeature relations due to real-life experience with personally familiar faces.
    Ramon M
    Perception; 2015; 44(4):368-82. PubMed ID: 26492723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-life experience with personally familiar faces enhances discrimination based on global information.
    Ramon M; Van Belle G
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1465. PubMed ID: 26855852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of parts, wholes, and familiarity on face-selective responses in MEG.
    Harris AM; Aguirre GK
    J Vis; 2008 Aug; 8(10):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 19146346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarity and face processing.
    Osborne CD; Stevenage SV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 22906071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Idiosyncratic, Retinotopic Bias in Face Identification Modulated by Familiarity.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Taylor M; Cavanagh P; Gobbini MI
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 30294669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Famous faces as icons. The illusion of being an expert in the recognition of famous faces.
    Carbon CC
    Perception; 2008; 37(5):801-6. PubMed ID: 18605151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socially Important Faces Are Processed Preferentially to Other Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces in a Priming Task across a Range of Viewpoints.
    Keyes H; Zalicks C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156350. PubMed ID: 27219101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face familiarity decisions take 200 msec in the human brain: electrophysiological evidence from a go/no-go speeded task.
    Caharel S; Ramon M; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 26(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 23915049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a review and synopsis.
    Natu V; O'Toole AJ
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):726-47. PubMed ID: 21988381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familiarity facilitates feature-based face processing.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Wheeler KG; Cipolli C; Gobbini MI
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178895. PubMed ID: 28582439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal familiarity enhances sensitivity to horizontal structure during processing of face identity.
    Pachai MV; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ; Schyns PG; Ramon M
    J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):5. PubMed ID: 28593249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges.
    Goffaux V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18166166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.