These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26492729)

  • 1. Testing the mechanisms underlying improved distance judgments in virtual environments.
    Kunz BR; Creem-Regehr SH
    Perception; 2015; 44(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 26492729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
    Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Walking through a virtual environment improves perceived size within and beyond the walked space.
    Siegel ZD; Kelly JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27914094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rescaling of perceived space transfers across virtual environments.
    Siegel ZD; Kelly JW; Cherep LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1805-1814. PubMed ID: 28967784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual arm's reach influences perceived distances but only after experience reaching.
    Linkenauger SA; Bülthoff HH; Mohler BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():393-401. PubMed ID: 25446965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of parallax and interpupillary distance on size judgment performances of virtual objects in stereoscopic displays.
    Woldegiorgis BH; Lin CJ; Liang WZ
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jan; 62(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 30235062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of previously seen objects' sizes in distance judgments.
    Sousa R; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):2. PubMed ID: 23378131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frontal extents in virtual environments are not immune to underperception.
    Kelly JW; Hammel W; Sjolund LA; Siegel ZD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1848-53. PubMed ID: 26105656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accommodation and size-constancy of virtual objects.
    Kenyon RV; Phenany M; Sandin D; Defanti T
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 36(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 18066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction with an immersive virtual environment corrects users' distance estimates.
    Richardson AR; Waller D
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):507-17. PubMed ID: 17552313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the accuracy of size perception on screen-based displays: Displayed objects appear smaller than real objects.
    Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB; Lessard DA; Geuss MN
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Sep; 21(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 26121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometric calibration of head-mounted displays and its effects on distance estimation.
    Kellner F; Bolte B; Bruder G; Rautenberg U; Steinicke F; Lappe M; Koch R
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 22402686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Through the looking glass: how the relationship between an object and its reflection affects the perception of distance and size.
    Jones LA; Bertamini M
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1572-94. PubMed ID: 18265840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgments of reachability are independent of visuomotor adaptation.
    de Grave DD; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Perception; 2011; 40(8):962-74. PubMed ID: 22132511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual distance estimation in static compared to moving virtual scenes.
    Frenz H; Lappe M
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 17120711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manipulating perception versus action in recalibration tasks.
    Ziemer CJ; Branson MJ; Chihak BJ; Kearney JK; Cremer JF; Plumert JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1260-74. PubMed ID: 23715972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body-scaled perception is subjected to adaptation when repetitively judging opportunities for grasping.
    Kim S; Frank TD
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2731-43. PubMed ID: 27220768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.