These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26492973)

  • 1. Filling in the gaps: using testing and restudy to promote associative learning.
    Bulevich JB; Thomas AK; Parsow C
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1267-77. PubMed ID: 26492973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.
    Arnold KM; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):940-5. PubMed ID: 22774852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing promotes long-term learning via stabilizing activation patterns in a large network of brain areas.
    Keresztes A; Kaiser D; Kovács G; Racsmány M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Nov; 24(11):3025-35. PubMed ID: 23796945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
    Abel M; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates?
    Pan SC; Wong CM; Potter ZE; Mejia J; Rickard TC
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 26324093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests of the separate retrieval of item and associative information using a frequency-judgment task.
    Hockley WE; Cristi C
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):796-811. PubMed ID: 8961823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
    Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
    Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective impairments of object knowledge in a case of acquired cortical blindness.
    Powell J; Davidoff J
    Memory; 1995; 3(3-4):435-61. PubMed ID: 8574873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dual memory theory of the testing effect.
    Rickard TC; Pan SC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 28585057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining retrieval-induced forgetting: A change in mental context between the study and restudy practice phases is not sufficient to cause forgetting.
    Buchli DR; Storm BC; Bjork RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1197-209. PubMed ID: 26241795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
    Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates?
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Brennan MK; Vitrano D; Crocco S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 28394159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.