133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26492985)
1. [Coronary stent evaluation with cardiac CT: Literature review].
Pesenti-Rossi D; Allouch P; Gibault-Genty G; Baron N; Augusto S; Convers-Domart R; Almeida S; Aubert S; Squara P; Livarek B
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2015 Nov; 64(5):362-7. PubMed ID: 26492985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cardiac CT: new applications].
Pesenti-Rossi D; Baron N; Allouch P; Convers R; Gibault-Genty G; Aubert S
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2014 Nov; 63(5):362-8. PubMed ID: 25261169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrative computed tomographic imaging of coronary artery disease.
Weininger M; Renker M; Rowe GW; Abro JA; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2011 Jan; 9(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 21166527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography.
Min JK; Swaminathan RV; Vass M; Gallagher S; Weinsaft JW
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 19577213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography.
Nakamura K; Funabashi N; Uehara M; Suzuki K; Terao M; Okubo K; Mita Y; Maeda F; Komuro I
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 130(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 18180050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography.
Schlosser T; Konorza T; Hunold P; Kühl H; Schmermund A; Barkhausen J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 44(6):1224-9. PubMed ID: 15364323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose.
Zhao L; Zhang Z; Fan Z; Yang L; Du J
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 19783395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical application of 64-slice CT angiography in the evaluation of lumen before and after coronary artery stent implantation].
Ma E; Yang Z; Feng Y; Zhang L; He Y; Guo Y; Qian L
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1311-4, 1318. PubMed ID: 19166199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population.
Haraldsdottir S; Gudnason T; Sigurdsson AF; Gudjonsdottir J; Lehman SJ; Eyjolfsson K; Scheving SS; Gibson CM; Hoffmann U; Jonsdottir B; Andersen K
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 19570632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography.
Sheth T; Dodd JD; Hoffmann U; Abbara S; Finn A; Gold HK; Brady TJ; Cury RC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jun; 69(7):933-8. PubMed ID: 17421013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using different convolution kernels and postprocessing filters.
Ulrich A; Burg MC; Raupach R; Bunck A; Schuelke C; Maintz D; Heindel W; Seifarth H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 24399513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease.
Jones CM; Athanasiou T; Dunne N; Kirby J; Attaran S; Chow A; Purkayastha S; Darzi A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 16857366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?
Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved coronary in-stent visualization using a combined high-resolution kernel and a hybrid iterative reconstruction technique at 256-slice cardiac CT-Pilot study.
Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Takaoka H; Katahira K; Honda K; Noda K; Oshima S; Yamashita Y
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 23219195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch computed tomography in the follow-up of patients with previous coronary stent implantation].
Zhou Y; Wang Q; Tian F; Yang JJ; Yang X; Dong J; Yang XB; He B; Chen YD
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 40(11):933-8. PubMed ID: 23363675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional modeling of double-stent techniques at the left main coronary artery bifurcation using micro-focus X-ray computed tomography.
Murasato Y; Horiuchi M; Otsuji Y
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Aug; 70(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 17421017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
Rief M; Zimmermann E; Stenzel F; Martus P; Stangl K; Greupner J; Knebel F; Kranz A; Schlattmann P; Laule M; Dewey M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1476-85. PubMed ID: 23792193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent developments in the use of computed tomography scanners in coronary artery imaging.
Aghayev A; Murphy DJ; Keraliya AR; Steigner ML
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016 Jun; 13(6):545-53. PubMed ID: 27140944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical evaluation of intracoronary in-stent stenosis by electron-beam CT single flow mode study].
Zhou Y; Dai RP; Gao RL; Lü SZ; Chen YD
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 33(8):687-90. PubMed ID: 16188048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Heart imaging: the accuracy of the 64-MSCT in the detection of coronary artery disease.
Alessandri N; Di Matteo A; Rondoni G; Petrassi M; Tufani F; Ferrari R; Laghi A
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 19673166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
