129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26493683)
1. Modeling the heterogeneity of p53 dynamics in DNA damage response.
Wu W; Sun W; Sun T
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2016 Feb; 14(1):1650001. PubMed ID: 26493683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elucidating the digital control mechanism for DNA damage repair with the p53-Mdm2 system: single cell data analysis and ensemble modelling.
Ogunnaike BA
J R Soc Interface; 2006 Feb; 3(6):175-84. PubMed ID: 16849229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanisms that enhance sustainability of p53 pulses.
Kim JK; Jackson TL
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65242. PubMed ID: 23755198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The p53 response in single cells is linearly correlated to the number of DNA breaks without a distinct threshold.
Loewer A; Karanam K; Mock C; Lahav G
BMC Biol; 2013 Nov; 11():114. PubMed ID: 24252182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mathematical modelling of p53 basal dynamics and DNA damage response.
Chong KH; Samarasinghe S; Kulasiri D
Math Biosci; 2015 Jan; 259():27-42. PubMed ID: 25433195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A plausible model for bimodal p53 switch in DNA damage response.
Sun T; Cui J
FEBS Lett; 2014 Mar; 588(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 24486906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage vary across cell lines and are shaped by efficiency of DNA repair and activity of the kinase ATM.
Stewart-Ornstein J; Lahav G
Sci Signal; 2017 Apr; 10(476):. PubMed ID: 28442631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein stability of p53 targets determines their temporal expression dynamics in response to p53 pulsing.
Hanson RL; Porter JR; Batchelor E
J Cell Biol; 2019 Apr; 218(4):1282-1297. PubMed ID: 30745421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Roles of cellular heterogeneity, intrinsic and extrinsic noise in variability of p53 oscillation.
Wang DG; Wang S; Huang B; Liu F
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5883. PubMed ID: 30971810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacologically Increasing Mdm2 Inhibits DNA Repair and Cooperates with Genotoxic Agents to Kill p53-Inactivated Ovarian Cancer Cells.
Carrillo AM; Hicks M; Khabele D; Eischen CM
Mol Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 13(8):1197-205. PubMed ID: 25964101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The kinetics of p53-binding and histone acetylation at target promoters do not strictly correlate with gene expression after UV damage.
Magrini R; Russo D; Fronza G; Inga A; Menichini P
J Cell Biochem; 2007 Apr; 100(5):1276-87. PubMed ID: 17063487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HAUSP-nucleolin interaction is regulated by p53-Mdm2 complex in response to DNA damage response.
Lim KH; Park JJ; Gu BH; Kim JO; Park SG; Baek KH
Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():12793. PubMed ID: 26238070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling amplified p53 responses under DNA-PK inhibition in DNA damage response.
Sun T; Li X; Shen P
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(10):17105-17114. PubMed ID: 28177883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. hnRNP K: an HDM2 target and transcriptional coactivator of p53 in response to DNA damage.
Moumen A; Masterson P; O'Connor MJ; Jackson SP
Cell; 2005 Dec; 123(6):1065-78. PubMed ID: 16360036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From structure to dynamics: frequency tuning in the p53-Mdm2 network. II Differential and stochastic approaches.
Ouattara DA; Abou-Jaoudé W; Kaufman M
J Theor Biol; 2010 Jun; 264(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 20346959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stochasticity of intranuclear biochemical reaction processes controls the final decision of cell fate associated with DNA damage.
Iwamoto K; Hamada H; Eguchi Y; Okamoto M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101333. PubMed ID: 25003668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling the role of p53 pulses in DNA damage- induced cell death decision.
Sun T; Chen C; Wu Y; Zhang S; Cui J; Shen P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():190. PubMed ID: 19545411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oscillatory Dynamics of p53-Mdm2 Circuit in Response to DNA Damage Caused by Ionizing Radiation.
Zhang Y; Liu H; Li Z; Miao Z; Zhou J
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(5):1703-1713. PubMed ID: 30762566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced DNA repair through droplet formation and p53 oscillations.
Heltberg MS; Lucchetti A; Hsieh FS; Minh Nguyen DP; Chen SH; Jensen MH
Cell; 2022 Nov; 185(23):4394-4408.e10. PubMed ID: 36368307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oscillations by the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop.
Lahav G
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2008; 641():28-38. PubMed ID: 18783169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
