BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26493683)

  • 41. Activation of the tumor suppressor p53 upon impairment of ribosome biogenesis.
    Bursac S; Brdovcak MC; Donati G; Volarevic S
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 Jun; 1842(6):817-30. PubMed ID: 24514102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Δ122p53, a mouse model of Δ133p53α, enhances the tumor-suppressor activities of an attenuated p53 mutant.
    Slatter TL; Hung N; Bowie S; Campbell H; Rubio C; Speidel D; Wilson M; Baird M; Royds JA; Braithwaite AW
    Cell Death Dis; 2015 Jun; 6(6):e1783. PubMed ID: 26068791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A common pathway to cancer: Oncogenic mutations abolish p53 oscillations.
    Xiong L; Garfinkel A
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2022 Oct; 174():28-40. PubMed ID: 35752348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is required for p53-dependent signal transduction induced by radiation.
    Wang X; Ohnishi K; Takahashi A; Ohnishi T
    Oncogene; 1998 Dec; 17(22):2819-25. PubMed ID: 9879988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Contribution of time delays to p53 oscillation in DNA damage response.
    Wang C; Liu H; Zhou J
    IET Syst Biol; 2019 Aug; 13(4):180-185. PubMed ID: 31318335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dynamics of P53 in response to DNA damage: Mathematical modeling and perspective.
    Sun T; Cui J
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2015 Nov; 119(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 26278643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. UBTD1 induces cellular senescence through an UBTD1-Mdm2/p53 positive feedback loop.
    Zhang XW; Wang XF; Ni SJ; Qin W; Zhao LQ; Hua RX; Lu YW; Li J; Dimri GP; Guo WJ
    J Pathol; 2015 Mar; 235(4):656-67. PubMed ID: 25382750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mouse double minute 2 associates with chromatin in the presence of p53 and is released to facilitate activation of transcription.
    White DE; Talbott KE; Arva NC; Bargonetti J
    Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 66(7):3463-70. PubMed ID: 16585169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Model-based translation of DNA damage signaling dynamics across cell types.
    Heldring MM; Wijaya LS; Niemeijer M; Yang H; Lakhal T; Le Dévédec SE; van de Water B; Beltman JB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jul; 18(7):e1010264. PubMed ID: 35802572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. p53 dynamics control cell fate.
    Purvis JE; Karhohs KW; Mock C; Batchelor E; Loewer A; Lahav G
    Science; 2012 Jun; 336(6087):1440-4. PubMed ID: 22700930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mathematical Modelling of p53 Signalling during DNA Damage Response: A Survey.
    Eliaš J; Macnamara CK
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 34638930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. DNA damage strength modulates a bimodal switch of p53 dynamics for cell-fate control.
    Chen X; Chen J; Gan S; Guan H; Zhou Y; Ouyang Q; Shi J
    BMC Biol; 2013 Jun; 11():73. PubMed ID: 23800173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relationship between DNA single-stranded damage response and double-stranded damage response.
    Ma A; Dai X
    Cell Cycle; 2018; 17(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 29157089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells.
    Batchelor E; Loewer A; Mock C; Lahav G
    Mol Syst Biol; 2011 May; 7():488. PubMed ID: 21556066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mathematical Modeling of p53 Pathways.
    Kim E; Kim JY; Lee JY
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 31635420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mathematical model identifies effective P53 accumulation with target gene binding affinity in DNA damage response for cell fate decision.
    Sun T; Mu D; Cui J
    Cell Cycle; 2018; 17(24):2716-2730. PubMed ID: 30488759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fourier analysis and systems identification of the p53 feedback loop.
    Geva-Zatorsky N; Dekel E; Batchelor E; Lahav G; Alon U
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(30):13550-5. PubMed ID: 20622152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. p53 mRNA Metabolism Links with the DNA Damage Response.
    Vadivel Gnanasundram S; Bonczek O; Wang L; Chen S; Fahraeus R
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 34573428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. p53 pulses lead to distinct patterns of gene expression albeit similar DNA-binding dynamics.
    Hafner A; Stewart-Ornstein J; Purvis JE; Forrester WC; Bulyk ML; Lahav G
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2017 Oct; 24(10):840-847. PubMed ID: 28825732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems.
    Wilkinson DJ
    Nat Rev Genet; 2009 Feb; 10(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 19139763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.