121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26493683)
81. A matter of life or death: modeling DNA damage and repair in bacteria.
Karschau J; de Almeida C; Richard MC; Miller S; Booth IR; Grebogi C; de Moura AP
Biophys J; 2011 Feb; 100(4):814-21. PubMed ID: 21320424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Constant rate of p53 tetramerization in response to DNA damage controls the p53 response.
Gaglia G; Lahav G
Mol Syst Biol; 2014 Oct; 10(10):753. PubMed ID: 25344068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Activation of a unique p53-dependent DNA damage response.
Yang J; Ahmed A; Ashcroft M
Cell Cycle; 2009 May; 8(10):1630-2. PubMed ID: 19372763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
84. A Hill type equation can predict target gene expression driven by p53 pulsing.
Shi X
FEBS Open Bio; 2021 Jun; 11(6):1799-1808. PubMed ID: 33955710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Commentary on "Participation of p53 Protein in the Cellular Response to DNA Damage".
Kastan MB
Cancer Res; 2016 Jul; 76(13):3663-5. PubMed ID: 27371738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
86. Creative damage unleashes transcription.
Calderwood SK
Cell Cycle; 2016; 15(8):1021-2. PubMed ID: 26919409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. A branching process model of heterogeneous DNA damages caused by radiotherapy in in vitro cell cultures.
Bastogne T; Marchand JL; Pinel S; Vallois P
Math Biosci; 2017 Dec; 294():100-109. PubMed ID: 29054768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Optimal treatment and stochastic modeling of heterogeneous tumors.
Badri H; Leder K
Biol Direct; 2016 Aug; 11(1):40. PubMed ID: 27549860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Under-replicated DNA gets a second chance.
Mirabella A
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2019 May; 20(5):264-265. PubMed ID: 30886332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
90. Oscillations by the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop.
Lahav G
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2008; 641():28-38. PubMed ID: 18783169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Regulation of MDM2 Stability After DNA Damage.
Li J; Kurokawa M
J Cell Physiol; 2015 Oct; 230(10):2318-27. PubMed ID: 25808808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Modeling the heterogeneity of p53 dynamics in DNA damage response.
Wu W; Sun W; Sun T
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2016 Feb; 14(1):1650001. PubMed ID: 26493683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Elucidating the digital control mechanism for DNA damage repair with the p53-Mdm2 system: single cell data analysis and ensemble modelling.
Ogunnaike BA
J R Soc Interface; 2006 Feb; 3(6):175-84. PubMed ID: 16849229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Mechanisms that enhance sustainability of p53 pulses.
Kim JK; Jackson TL
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65242. PubMed ID: 23755198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. The p53 response in single cells is linearly correlated to the number of DNA breaks without a distinct threshold.
Loewer A; Karanam K; Mock C; Lahav G
BMC Biol; 2013 Nov; 11():114. PubMed ID: 24252182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Mathematical modelling of p53 basal dynamics and DNA damage response.
Chong KH; Samarasinghe S; Kulasiri D
Math Biosci; 2015 Jan; 259():27-42. PubMed ID: 25433195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
98.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
99.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
100.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
