151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26495325)
1. Knowledge of Federal Regulations for Mental Health Research Involving Prisoners.
Johnson ME; Brems C; Bergman AL; Mills ME; Eldridge GD
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2015; 6(4):12-18. PubMed ID: 26495325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conducting Ethical Research with Correctional Populations: Do Researchers and IRB Members Know the Federal Regulations?
Johnson ME; Brems C; Hanson BL; Corey SL; Eldridge GD; Mitchell K
Res Ethics; 2014 Mar; 10(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 26097498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HIV/AIDS research in correctional settings: perspectives on training needs from researchers and IRB members.
Kondo KK; Johnson ME; Ironside EF; Brems C; Eldridge GD
AIDS Educ Prev; 2014 Dec; 26(6):565-76. PubMed ID: 25490736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mental Health Research in Correctional Settings: Perceptions of Risk and Vulnerabilities.
Johnson ME; Kondo KK; Brems C; Ironside EF; Eldridge GD
Ethics Behav; 2016; 26(3):238-251. PubMed ID: 27092025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IRB/FDA requirements relevant to HIV/AIDS clinical trials in correctional settings.
Cohen J;
AIDS Read; 2001 Jan; 11(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 11215087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.
McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P
J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HIV/AIDS Research in Correctional Settings: A Difficult Task Made Even Harder?
Johnson ME; Kondo KK; Brems C; Eldridge GD
J Correct Health Care; 2015 Apr; 21(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 25788606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protection of human participants in health research - a comparison of some US Federal Regulations and South African Research Ethics guidelines.
Cleaton-Jones P; Wassenaar D
S Afr Med J; 2010 Nov; 100(11):712-6. PubMed ID: 21081019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle.
Chodos AH; Lee SJ
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():19. PubMed ID: 25889147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Federal interpretation and enforcement of protections for vulnerable participants in human research.
Iltis AS; Wall A; Lesandrini J; Rangel EK; Chibnall JT
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Mar; 4(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19374484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Empirical Ethics Agenda for Psychiatric Research Involving Prisoners.
Christopher PP; Candilis PJ; Rich JD; Lidz CW
AJOB Prim Res; 2011; 2(4):18-25. PubMed ID: 25309805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On research on HIV infection and AIDS in correctional institutions.
Dubler NN; Sidel VW
Milbank Q; 1989; 67(2):171-207. PubMed ID: 2630900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional Review Boards and post-approval monitoring (PAM) of human research: content analysis of select university (academic health center) web pages across the USA.
Cox S; Solbakk JH; Luthardt F; Bernabe RD
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Mar; 39(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 36730540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commentary: labeling institutional review board members does not lead to better protections for research participants.
Speers MA; Rose S
Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 22735560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determining risk in pediatric research with no prospect of direct benefit: time for a national consensus on the interpretation of federal regulations.
Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ; Prentice ED
Am J Bioeth; 2007 Mar; 7(3):5-10. PubMed ID: 17366219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The protectors and the protected: what regulators and researchers can learn from IRB members and subjects.
Cook AF; Hoas H; Joyner JC
Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2013; 3(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 24407005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a University's Institutional Review Board Based on Campus Feedback: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Rajab MH; Alkawi MZ; Gazal AM; Alshehri FA; Shaibah HS; Holmes LD
Cureus; 2019 Oct; 11(10):e5829. PubMed ID: 31754564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Those Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members.
Mhaskar R; Pathak EB; Wieten S; Guterbock TM; Kumar A; Djulbegovic B
Acta Inform Med; 2015 Aug; 23(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 26483590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
