350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26496550)
21. Comparison of image noise and image quality between full-dose abdominal computed tomography scans reconstructed with weighted filtered back projection and half-dose scans reconstructed with improved sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE*).
Choy S; Parhar D; Lian K; Schmiedeskamp H; Louis L; O'Connell T; McLaughlin P; Nicolaou S
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jan; 44(1):355-361. PubMed ID: 29980828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiation dose reduction with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for chest CT in children: an intra-individual comparison.
Lee SH; Kim MJ; Yoon CS; Lee MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):e938-43. PubMed ID: 22795526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Full- and Half-Dose Image Reconstruction With Filtered Back Projection or Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction in Dual-Source Single-Energy MDCT Urography.
Kim SH; Kim MJ; Lee HJ; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):641-648. PubMed ID: 30040466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction in thoracoabdominal CT, using Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) technique in a longitudinal study.
Scharf M; Brendel S; Melzer K; Hentschke C; May M; Uder M; Lell MM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180302. PubMed ID: 28678818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Observer performance for adaptive, image-based denoising and filtered back projection compared to scanner-based iterative reconstruction for lower dose CT enterography.
Fletcher JG; Hara AK; Fidler JL; Silva AC; Barlow JM; Carter RE; Bartley A; Shiung M; Holmes DR; Weber NK; Bruining DH; Yu L; McCollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jun; 40(5):1050-9. PubMed ID: 25725794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of urolithiasis: comparison of 100% tube exposure images reconstructed with filtered back projection and 50% tube exposure images reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction.
Remer EM; Herts BR; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Greiwe A; Roesel DM; Purysko AS; Feldman MK; De S; Shah SN; Dong F; Monga M; Baker ME
Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):749-56. PubMed ID: 24814177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pilot study of detection, radiologist confidence and image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction at half-routine dose level.
Fletcher JG; Krueger WR; Hough DM; Huprich JE; Fidler JL; Wang J; Shiung MM; Harmsen WS; Grant KL; McCollough CH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 23493209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection.
Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Wu R; Gibbs KP; Yu W; Li M; Zhang Z
Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 22981731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. CT image quality in sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction phantom study - is there a point of diminishing returns?
Infante JC; Liu Y; Rigsby CK
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Mar; 47(3):333-341. PubMed ID: 27891546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Leipsic J; Nguyen G; Brown J; Sin D; Mayo JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20966312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography: comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with different strengths.
Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Wu R; Nance JW; Lv B; Yang H; Li F; Lu D; Zhang Z
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24625599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing Fourth Generation Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Standard Filtered Back Projection in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Examinations.
Thomas AK; Southard R; Curran J; Augustyn R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 29189401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reaching for better image quality and lower radiation dose in head and neck CT: advanced modeled and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction in combination with tube voltage adaptation.
Schmid AI; Uder M; Lell MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jan; 46(1):20160131. PubMed ID: 27540625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions.
Baumueller S; Winklehner A; Karlo C; Goetti R; Flohr T; Russi EW; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Eur Radiol; 2012 Dec; 22(12):2597-606. PubMed ID: 22699873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reduced-dose low-voltage chest CT angiography with Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction versus standard-dose filtered back projection.
Pontana F; Pagniez J; Duhamel A; Flohr T; Faivre JB; Murphy C; Remy J; Remy-Jardin M
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):609-18. PubMed ID: 23297336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance of iterative image reconstruction in CT of the paranasal sinuses: a phantom study.
Schulz B; Beeres M; Bodelle B; Bauer R; Al-Butmeh F; Thalhammer A; Vogl TJ; Kerl JM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 May; 34(5):1072-6. PubMed ID: 23221946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
