488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26496558)
1. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population.
Kershah S; Partovi S; Traughber BJ; Muzic RF; Schluchter MD; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 23632951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hybrid [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Heusch P; Köhler J; Wittsack HJ; Heusner TA; Buchbender C; Poeppel TD; Nensa F; Wetter A; Gauler T; Hartung V; Lanzman RS
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2055-60. PubMed ID: 23830904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of semiquantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET parameters derived from simultaneous brain PET/MRI: a feasibility study.
Jena A; Taneja S; Goel R; Renjen P; Negi P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1269-1274. PubMed ID: 24813529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semiquantitative Assessment of
Minamimoto R; Xu G; Jamali M; Holley D; Barkhodari A; Zaharchuk G; Iagaru A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 28777652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability among measurements of the maximum and mean standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and measurements of tumor size on diagnostic CT in patients with pulmonary tumors.
Huang YE; Chen CF; Huang YJ; Konda SD; Appelbaum DE; Pu Y
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):782-8. PubMed ID: 20707663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thoracic staging in lung cancer: prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Gauler T; Gomez B; Reis H; Stamatis G; Kühl H; Hartung V; Heusner TA
J Nucl Med; 2014 Mar; 55(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 24504054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of segmentation-based attenuation correction methods for PET/MRI: evaluation of bone and liver standardized uptake value with oncologic PET/CT data.
Kim JH; Lee JS; Song IC; Lee DS
J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1878-82. PubMed ID: 23081993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging in comparison to PET/CT in pediatric oncology: initial results.
Schäfer JF; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Gückel B; Bezrukov I; Pfannenberg CA; Reimold M; Ebinger M; Fuchs J; Claussen CD; Schwenzer NF
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):220-31. PubMed ID: 24877983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficients on diffusion-weighted MRI and standardized uptake value on FDG-PET/CT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Eguchi H; Nagano H; Wakasa K; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1034-41. PubMed ID: 25267921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.
Seith F; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Bezrukov I; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: comparison with standard CT attenuation correction.
Vontobel J; Liga R; Possner M; Clerc OF; Mikulicic F; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EE; Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Pazhenkottil AP; Benz DC; Gräni C; Gaemperli O; Herzog B; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 26091704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PET/MR imaging in the detection and characterization of pulmonary lesions: technical and diagnostic evaluation in comparison to PET/CT.
Rauscher I; Eiber M; Fürst S; Souvatzoglou M; Nekolla SG; Ziegler SI; Rummeny EJ; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 May; 55(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 24652827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
